A thousand people owning little plots of land along the riverbank and dealing with the various negative externalizations of river-land development: Broke, Lame, Anti-Intellectual
One single individual having a property title than spans the entire river as well as all of its tributaries and estuaries: Woke, Based, Genius
Real Estate Monopolies are Good Aktuly. The Free Market Has Spoken.
The river not belonging to a single entity is a massive inefficiency, all those people and animals using it for drinking water basically provides no value vs a big industrial development upstream that generates cash and jobs
Nobody will pay to maintain the river if it's commonly owned. It needs to be owned by a single individual who will have financial incentivization to maintain, wait what's that noise behi- :stalin-gun-1: :stalin-gun-2:
A thousand people owning little plots of land along the riverbank and dealing with the various negative externalizations of river-land development: Broke, Lame, Anti-Intellectual
One single individual having a property title than spans the entire river as well as all of its tributaries and estuaries: Woke, Based, Genius
Real Estate Monopolies are Good Aktuly. The Free Market Has Spoken.
The river not belonging to a single entity is a massive inefficiency, all those people and animals using it for drinking water basically provides no value vs a big industrial development upstream that generates cash and jobs
:porky-happy:
Plus like, boats
Nobody will pay to maintain the river if it's commonly owned. It needs to be owned by a single individual who will have financial incentivization to maintain, wait what's that noise behi- :stalin-gun-1: :stalin-gun-2: