Putting this in writing because, at heart, this is a writing issue for me.
I'm reading a story about a man who's portrayed as this super compassionate person when he nurses a goat back to health and in between chapters he's hungrily eating lamb stew. Like do you know where that comes from?
It's really annoying because it's just so jarring. I'm not saying that you can't be a good person while eating meat, but I wish it wasn't that thoughtles. It's a trope that's frustratingly common.
One of the most famous examples is Steven Universe. I try to go easy on the character, given his youth and upbringing, but the writers should have addressed it. I won't expect veganism right off the bat, but it felt strange that his thoughts on eating meat didn't come up any time he ate meat. And eating meat shows up in several plot-intensive scenes. It's a shame too because he's a half human and half alien that doesn't need to eat. And the plot features themes of oppression and imperialism.
I just wish character writing wasn't so bad sometimes. Just give your main character a different trait if you want to describe eating meat. It's not that hard, is it?
-edit: I'm not trying to spark another struggle session, I just hate seeing character disconnects like that where it's not even brought up. It's legit just bad writing. You can have a protagonist eat meat and still have a good person.
The particular story I was reading featured a contemporary adult temporarily living at a farm. He cares about particular animals there but the author makes a fumble by not even drawing a connection between the goat he befriends and the ones he eats. If his personality wasn't such a Mary Sue, and the author didn't mention it every five pages, I could've ignored the dissonance.
Hmm, yes, I'm also a people lover. I have several of them in my basement. I love the way they scream, "Oh God please let me out! I don't want to starve to death!" People are so great.
What, you're telling me that's not what being a people lover is? That's just, like, your opinion.
I mean, this argument has been done a million times, but my stance is humans =/= other animals. I love gardening, I very much care for my plants, but the root veg gets pulled up and dies to be eaten - the line is drawn is somewhere by everyone (except Jains).
Utterly incoherent post. Of course humans aren't other animals, why does that matter? It isn't immoral to harm humans because of some divine law about harming humans, it's immortal to harm humans because that causes suffering. That is not a way in which we differ from other animals. It is a way in which we differ from plants.
See, if you were vegan, you wouldn't have to twist yourself into these weird incoherent logical knots.