Unsettled borders. Lol. Its occupied by India. And also India has been instrumental in displacing people. Conducting pogroms. Grabbing land. There's vested western interests who have been interfering and aiding india. This intensified since around partition in '47. Maybe you should learn what kashmir and its history before downplaying them "problems".
They are routinely targeted. Not just that broadly west and its proxies like israel also give support to keep blacksites to carryout torture. They even supply intel to people carrying rohingya genocide to hunt people down who flee to mizoram or bangladesh or kashmir.
Paramilitaries take away kids to torture sites and estimates at 2020 were like over 10,000. They target schools, food rations and hospitals all the time. Also not to mention India hates any media leak or covergae so it constantly bans internet and keeps high surveillance.
India has been trotting out big name companies to "develop" the place and open real estate. So saying this is some "south east asian problem over religion" is demeaning.
Sure pakistan is a client state of US. Pak has interest over kashmir but at this point it can barely concentrate on its own. The larger hold has been had India. At this point US state has better standing with India.
The aid from west since war on terror has been primarily used by paramilitaries here in my country to broadly quash movements. Whether its communist movements with operation steepleback or targeting tribal land through Israeli tech or broadly targeting kashmiri people.
USA has billions in deals with India and sees it as strategic stand against china. The usa sure picked picked when british left. To use pak and Afghanistan against USSR. But at this point it shifted from assets in pak or afghanistan to India.
By this year India has restructured their control on j&k since 2020. They got the authority to decide land reforms and development in j&k not pak. They make sure whether internet works or not to control the information flow. Indian military has the stronghold not pak.
Yet you accuse me of one siding this, which is very gross. On top of it you tell me that I don't know history or what happened back when the king signs over. I know all that and also just cause a king signed that doesn't grant carte blanche to India. Its been decades from that and a lot shifted since. Pakistan can't decide shit in kashmir cause it doesn't call any shots, India does. Calling pak kashmir occupier in 2024 is untrue and laughable.
You sound exactly like a Palestinian genocide denier. Since when do "rulers" making decisions to give up an entire country to another state mean anything?
Kings, shahs, priests, etc have no right to sign off ownership to another country.
The kashmiris of today want freedom and independence, fuck India and Pakistan.
Unsettled borders. Lol. Its occupied by India. And also India has been instrumental in displacing people. Conducting pogroms. Grabbing land. There's vested western interests who have been interfering and aiding india. This intensified since around partition in '47. Maybe you should learn what kashmir and its history before downplaying them "problems".
Arent people involved in the Kashmiri indie movement routilinely assasinated also?
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/1990_Gawkadal_massacre
Im pretty confident they also endured things such as the above...
I do think the most comparable struggle at the moment would be Irelands struggle, but parrells to Palestine arent uncalled for either honestly.
They are routinely targeted. Not just that broadly west and its proxies like israel also give support to keep blacksites to carryout torture. They even supply intel to people carrying rohingya genocide to hunt people down who flee to mizoram or bangladesh or kashmir.
Paramilitaries take away kids to torture sites and estimates at 2020 were like over 10,000. They target schools, food rations and hospitals all the time. Also not to mention India hates any media leak or covergae so it constantly bans internet and keeps high surveillance.
India has been trotting out big name companies to "develop" the place and open real estate. So saying this is some "south east asian problem over religion" is demeaning.
https://youtu.be/cvhddK3tWNY
This is the scope of my understanding of this conflict, id reccomend anyone watch it.
Thanks for the more in depth perspective, im still shaping my understanding of this.
The gdf vid is decent. I'd suggest reading on ground reports to get a decent grasp on current state.
I found a YouTube link in your comment. Here are links to the same video on alternative frontends that protect your privacy:
Removed by mod
Sure pakistan is a client state of US. Pak has interest over kashmir but at this point it can barely concentrate on its own. The larger hold has been had India. At this point US state has better standing with India.
The aid from west since war on terror has been primarily used by paramilitaries here in my country to broadly quash movements. Whether its communist movements with operation steepleback or targeting tribal land through Israeli tech or broadly targeting kashmiri people.
USA has billions in deals with India and sees it as strategic stand against china. The usa sure picked picked when british left. To use pak and Afghanistan against USSR. But at this point it shifted from assets in pak or afghanistan to India.
By this year India has restructured their control on j&k since 2020. They got the authority to decide land reforms and development in j&k not pak. They make sure whether internet works or not to control the information flow. Indian military has the stronghold not pak.
Yet you accuse me of one siding this, which is very gross. On top of it you tell me that I don't know history or what happened back when the king signs over. I know all that and also just cause a king signed that doesn't grant carte blanche to India. Its been decades from that and a lot shifted since. Pakistan can't decide shit in kashmir cause it doesn't call any shots, India does. Calling pak kashmir occupier in 2024 is untrue and laughable.
deleted by creator
You sound exactly like a Palestinian genocide denier. Since when do "rulers" making decisions to give up an entire country to another state mean anything?
Kings, shahs, priests, etc have no right to sign off ownership to another country.
The kashmiris of today want freedom and independence, fuck India and Pakistan.