I know this site generally has an ambivalent-to-negative view of Picasso (for plenty of good reasons), but I had no idea he made an antiwar painting that referenced american atrocities in Korea. Just another example of how that conflict has been forcibly memory-holed in this hemisphere.
Here's an excerpt from the Picasso museum regarding the work's reception:
Picasso takes sides with the innocent in the painting, as he had done in the Guernica during the Civil War, but the work did not please anyone at the time. It upset the leaders of the French Communist Party, of whom Picasso was a militant, who considered the aesthetics of the painting too far removed from socialist realism. And obviously because of its theme, it came as a complete shock in sectors of international criticism, close to American museums like the MOMA in New York. “Although nobody likes it, it is something, isn’t it?”, said Picasso.
Wasn't he a communist? Not that I care considering who he is outside of his art, but it's just another example of famous people's socialist/communist history being erased. They don't even use it to rail against him and communism as ruining creativity or something lol
my understanding is that he wasn't a very good communist. and then there's the quip from Dali:
wasn't Dali a fascist
Yes
probably
Dali was a sellout
Yes, which makes the show La Casa de Papel much weirder, because the characters and movement they're a part of is supposed to be anti-fascist, but they use Dali as their mascot