Patreon ☭ https://patreon.com/socialismforall BuyMeACoffee ☭ https://buymeacoffee.com/socialismforall Bluesky ☭ https://bsky.app/profile/socialismforall.bsky.social Discord ☭ socialismforall Mastodon ☭ https://ioc.exchange/@socialismforall Medium ☭ https://medium.com/@SocialismForAll Reddit ☭ https://reddit.com/user/SocialismForAll Soundcloud ☭ https://soundcloud.com/socialismforall Spotify ☭ https://open.spotify.com/show/3byqQVsdTzhE2dOsnAUmK5 Substack ☭ https://substack.com/@SocialismForAll TikTok ☭ https://www.tiktok.com/@socialismforall Tumblr ☭ https://www.tumblr.com/socialismforall Twitch ☭ https://twitch.tv/SocialismS4A Twitter ☭ https://twitter.com/SocialismS4A YouTube ☭ https://youtube.com/SocialismForAll Socialism for All does not run ads on its material. Please consider becoming a financial contributor on Patreon or BuyMeACoffee today for as little as $2/month! Link to article: https://github.com/Red-Spectre/Info/blob/main/Against%20Dengism.md Timestamps: 0:00 Intro & Table of Contents 1:42 Is China Socialist? (Does Capital Exist in China?) 9:00 "It's Socialism with Chinese Characteristics! It's adapted to local conditions!" 12:13 "But they kill billionaires! Why would a dictatorship of the bourgeoisie do that?" 15:20 "The CPC has bad factions in it, but Xi Jinping is fighting to restore/preserve the dictatorship of the proletariat!" 20:48 "What about poverty reduction?" 23:01 "Isn't it just like Lenin's NEP?" 36:28 If capital must take control of the state, why did the USSR survive the NEP to continue socialist construction? 42:14 When discussing productive forces, we cannot forget the relations of production 51:50 When do we know that the relations of production ought to change? 1:01:52 When can the absence of such transition be used to detect a reactionary state? 1:05:48 Thanks to the patrons #s4a​​ #socialismforall​​ #socialism4all​​ #revolution2030​​ #rev2030 #demexit #socialism​​ #communism​​ #marxism​​ #marxismleninism​​​​ #socialist #communist #marxistleninist #lenin #leninism #marx #economics #news #politics #antifa #antifascist #antifascism #audiobook #audiobooks #audiolibrary #history #theory #democracy #democraticparty #democrats #democracia #capitalismkills #solidarity #solidaridad #solidariedade #karlmarx #philosophy #philosophyclass #china #chinese #socialismwithchinesecharacteristics #chineseeconomy #chinaeconomy #swcc
  • LesbianLiberty [she/her]
    ·
    6 months ago

    While the claim may have merit, it requires more evidence than a WaPo article. The following paragraph is, I think, interesting.

    What will the future look like? The International Monetary Fund puts China’s GDP growth at below 4% in the coming years, less than half of its tally for most of the past four decades. Capital Economics, a London-based research firm, figures China’s trend growth has slowed to 3% from 5% in 2019, and will fall to around 2% in 2030.

    Stop the presses!!! Less than 4% yoy growth 😱??? This still far exceeds American growth. This article is old enough that updated data may have been released to confirm the authors' conclusions, so, to make a claim like that meritously it might be worth doing that and engaging with the data outside of a newspaper which is owned by one of the richest men in the world and based in the capital of the world's most brutal and extractive empire which benefit from anti-communist propaganda. I don't say this to dismiss any possibility of economic slowdown however, merely that the burden of proof on this is higher than WaPo.