What we see here is the exploration the relationship between Master and Slave. In this specific dom/sub context, we have two parties engaging in power exchange for erotic purposes. (It is important to note, however, that unlike the traditional dialectic described by Hegel, the power dynamic in a dom/sub relationship is typically consensual and negotiated between the parties involved. Moving on–)

In this context, the dom is seen as the "master," who seeks recognition and validation from the submissive person (the "slave") through their willing submission and obedience. The dom, however, has their “power” held entirely in the hands on the sub’s (non)willingness to provide them the labor (appeasing the dom consensually, though it is important to remember that this dialectic is not traditionally based on a consensual relationship) necessary to continue the dom/sub relationship. The submissive person is, in turn, consensually seeking recognition from the dominant partner, having recognized that they indeed have given up power to the dom in return for, in this context, pleasure. The entire relationship is based on the recognition by both parties of their respective power and powerlessness as it relates to each other. Despite the “master” (dom) appearing to hold the power in this relationship, their power is inherently only affirmed through the recognition of others.

Taking this one step further, this dialectic, through a marxist perspective, is how we arrive at the concept of class conflict of owning class vs. working class