Because I've known this whole time and definitely didn't just figure it out when I picked the game up again to check out Freelancer mode.

Okay but seriously, I wasn't all that "aware" in 2016 when the game came out and I don't think I even knew who Epstein and Maxwell were at the time. The devs sure did though because the very first mission is to kill those creeps. They pull their punches a bit because the devs are obviously libs. There's no sex-trafficking per sé, they just use (adult) fashion models to compromise powerful and influential people and obtain useful information they can sell, but it's still unmistakable that it's them. It didn't click for me until I heard an NPC convo about Margolis father being an Israeli military general (guessing they went with that instead of Mossad for a little plausible deniability), which is also in the character bio I didn't read.

Really wish the devs weren't so liberal because it could have been a really fun game about murdering the 1% of the 1%. It is that to a certain extent, but my biggest disappointment in the whole series was when I got to the Isle of Sgail mission. It's a secret island in the middle of the ocean where the global elite are meeting to strategize over escaping the ravages of climate change and conduct demonic rituals. I was so excited to get in there and go nuts, until I watched the mission briefing and...

Forgive me for doing an identity politics, but you're telling me the most powerful of these powerful people are two young Black women, and I'm supposed to kill them while extracting an old white man unharmed? And by the game's own admission, these two don't even need to die? They're just "collateral damage" so I can get the items they're carrying, and also it's fine to kill them because we're throwing in a few vague details about how they're bad people doing white colonizer shit? Jfc. If they were gonna go with this story, I feel like they could have made it one of those twist-on-the-formula missions and require the player to do the whole thing non-lethally. The mechanics for pick-pocketing and non-lethally subduing NPCs are already built into the game. A tiny bit of imagination and creativity could have gone a long way. Seems to me like what happened here was the liberals making the game wanted to go for "inclusivity," and that's a nice thing on its face, but then they decided to be "inclusive" in a way that just makes the proceedings uncomfortable. I wanted to have a nice time assassinating the pedophile elite, not the members of Destiny's Child.

Now that I've written far too much on the subject, I would like to hear everyone else's good opinions. All else aside, the HITMAN games are among my favorites in recent years.

  • Cromalin [she/her]
    ·
    edit-2
    2 years ago

    yeah i think that mission was a weird failure of inclusion more than anything else. outside the politics not being great past a vague surface level deal they're a lot of fun

    have no idea how they'll adapt to a james bond game, but i am kind of excited to see it