https://nitter.1d4.us/charliebilello/status/1635982686111121408

  • MaoistLandlord [he/him]
    ·
    edit-2
    2 years ago

    I don’t get how this works. You would need to keep money in the bank for the same amount to be insured. What’s the point of keeping, say, $5 million at SVB if you lose it and just get $5 million? You haven’t made any profits.

    Unless they’re suggesting that they’ll reinvest/loan out the money, and if they make money the depositor profits via interest, and if they lose money, the government will just refund them the original amount

    • Circle_circle [any]
      ·
      edit-2
      2 years ago

      In the scenario, the person can either put 5 mil in SVB, lose it, and then get it all back without any worry or they can put that 5 mil into another bank and if it failed, they would lose that 5 mil.

      • MaoistLandlord [he/him]
        ·
        2 years ago

        Ah okay. That makes sense. But didn’t the fed seize it? I thought once that happens they’re gonna get liquidated and normal operations stop