Glaze protects our work by ruining ai generative output. Not only should we protect our work with Glaze, we should avoid mentioning that it’s protected so they keep feeding it into the machine, effectively poisoning the AI :). pic.twitter.com/Bd6xvf3JWS— 🏳️🌈Chris Shehan 👓🔪 (@ChrisShehanArt) March 17, 2023
Check it out if you do art: https://glaze.cs.uchicago.edu/
I don’t see anything wrong with preserving things that you create. If you want it to be exclusively enjoyed, why not? If it’s not vital to human survival or society to function, no one should be entitled to it if you don’t feel like it
Plus this doesn’t exactly ruin any artwork that is publicly viewable. All it does is make it non replicable by a machine. You can still right click and save image and spread it with others so that ability is not removed
If we're talking about a hypothetical society without private & intellectual property, I'm not trying to be prescriptive by the way, then I think there won't really be too many people sharing that concern. Human brains are remixing machines among other things. Machine learning generative models are trying to replicate as much of that capability as they can using computers, because then there's more net remixes happening. If it's collectively owned then I'd imagine the corpus of human output is as well.
I don’t see anything wrong with preserving things that you create. If you want it to be exclusively enjoyed, why not? If it’s not vital to human survival or society to function, no one should be entitled to it if you don’t feel like it
Plus this doesn’t exactly ruin any artwork that is publicly viewable. All it does is make it non replicable by a machine. You can still right click and save image and spread it with others so that ability is not removed
If we're talking about a hypothetical society without private & intellectual property, I'm not trying to be prescriptive by the way, then I think there won't really be too many people sharing that concern. Human brains are remixing machines among other things. Machine learning generative models are trying to replicate as much of that capability as they can using computers, because then there's more net remixes happening. If it's collectively owned then I'd imagine the corpus of human output is as well.