I appreciate the detailed response. I guess I'll just try and take an inventory of any concepts that I might have carried over from my Zizek days and make sure I don't put them forward in organizing or base my work in them in any way. I've been kind of doing that anyway, the Rockhill article really shook my faith in Z, but I had assumed that even if Z had twisted the source material, the source material was itself pretty legit. I guess I'll try to find other critiques. Thanks.