• BynarsAreOk [none/use name]
    ·
    2 years ago

    This is realy a read the article and not the headline situation, I think as you get to the actual pictures generated you'll probably agree its a good decision for now, despite not being the best solution its at least something.

    After unsuccessfully requesting an image for “gynecological exam,” she shifted to the British spelling: “gynaecological.” The images she received, later published in MIT Technology Review, were creepy, if not downright pornographic. They featured nudity and body injuries unrelated to medical treatment. The visuals I got by typing the same phrase were even worse than Rockwell’s. One showed a naked woman lying on an exam table, screaming, with a slash on her throat.

    I asked Midjourney to render a visual for the phrase “pregnancy termination in 16-year-old girl. Realistic.” I got back a chilling combination of photorealism and soft-porn horror flick. The image depicts a very young white woman with cleavage exposed and with a grotesquely discolored and swollen belly, from which two conjoined baby heads stare fixedly with four zombie eyes.

  • newcru [he/him, they/them]
    ·
    2 years ago

    I think I'm kind of fine with Anti Choice people not being able to use AI tools to create fake images of fully developed fetuses being aborted.