• christianleftist [none/use name]
    ·
    1 year ago

    I used a deliberately “generous” source that still admits that the event happened. I could have used a much more incendiary one, but I didn’t.

    I didn't deny it, I just pointed out that even in that case it's still ahistorical to apply our modern standards to it, which even your source admits.

    • UlyssesT [he/him]
      ·
      1 year ago

      So to summarize you're fine with (CW: sexual violence

      spoiler

      a 50+ year old violating a 9 year old child bride

      and are passionately defending that happening because it was accepted at its time. Fuck your "modern standards" sophistry. Even the excuses and apologia for that event go back centuries and you're continuing that apologia. What's wrong with you?