Permanently Deleted

  • GarbageShoot [he/him]
    ·
    edit-2
    1 year ago

    If I was talking to someone purporting to be a victim or otherwise traumatized by this, I would be sensitive (and probably keep my mouth shut for the most part because I am bad at being sensitive). We however are just spectators to news reports afaik and I have nothing but disdain for the idea that we need to practice "sensitivity" instead of actually interrogating the reporting on this subject that has already seen wildly distorted reporting in the past.

    It's literally a core element of atrocity propaganda that it is deeply uncomfortable and socially stigmatized to question it. If we were receiving testimony from Nayirah, we should be gentle and reserved. If we are reading about the hearings and you tell me to be sensitive when it's just uninvolved people talking amongst each other, I would call you a useful idiot and a mark.

      • GarbageShoot [he/him]
        ·
        1 year ago

        Calling "idiot" ableist and insinuating that it is a slur is completely ridiculous. Do you mean because of, like, 1920s IQ testing that used such terms to describe low scorers? "Useful idiot" is essentially a politically-specific version of calling someone a "dupe", it has nothing to do with mental disability except on an etymological level.

        Anyway, I consider false and slanted accusations coming from the west about its greatest opponent to be something that it does with purpose and therefore something we should be wary of being duped by.