arrow-up190imagePainRNAi [he/him] to urbanism • edit-21 year agomessage-square53 Commentsfedilinkfile-text
minus-squareFarman [any]hexbear2·1 year agoProbably the other way around since power is proportional to heigth of the water level and flow. The less you use for irrigation the more electricity. link
minus-squareRNAi [he/him]hexagonhexbear2·1 year agoYes but eventually the damn is always full and you use a constant flow equivalent of the mean yearly flow of the river before daming to produce electricity, right? Otherwise you wouldn't be able to output the same year-long, right? link
minus-squareRNAi [he/him]hexagonhexbear2·1 year agoThere should be more solutions to un-disrupt migration inside the river link
Probably the other way around since power is proportional to heigth of the water level and flow. The less you use for irrigation the more electricity.
Yes but eventually the damn is always full and you use a constant flow equivalent of the mean yearly flow of the river before daming to produce electricity, right?
Otherwise you wouldn't be able to output the same year-long, right?
A bit less due to evaporation losses but yes.
There should be more solutions to un-disrupt migration inside the river