I've always wanted to test what would happen to a firm that just tries not having a CEO. I think a lot of companies' bureaucracy would hum a long just fine
I've also noticed a pattern how any time there's a swap in upper management, first thing they do is throw out what the previous management was doing, cause they need to assert themselves as having their own ideas.
I've always wanted to test what would happen to a firm that just tries not having a CEO. I think a lot of companies' bureaucracy would hum a long just fine
I worked at a place where CEO left, and it took them over a year to hire a new one. Arguably, things ran smoother during that time.
Conversely, we replaced our CEO with one that is much more willfully stupid and have subsequently suffered for it
I've also noticed a pattern how any time there's a swap in upper management, first thing they do is throw out what the previous management was doing, cause they need to assert themselves as having their own ideas.