this is vaguely related to the string theory related post from a day or two ago, it's all bazinga science folks TL;DW string theory is a big thing because people that read pop science really liked it and it took a long time for physicists to come out in force and say "this is untestable garbage"

  • UlyssesT
    ·
    edit-2
    19 days ago

    deleted by creator

    • UnicodeHamSic [he/him]
      ·
      1 year ago

      I am saying by virtue of addressing the fact that it is wrong sometimes it is less propaganda that most shows where they never have that conversation. I am saying that you, and a subsection of people, are mad at the show for failing when most shows don't try. This not even my favorite edgy show. We have had this same conversation before. Art that ties and fails is more interesting than art that doesn't try.

      • UlyssesT
        ·
        edit-2
        19 days ago

        deleted by creator

        • UnicodeHamSic [he/him]
          ·
          1 year ago

          I feel like we are being justva little post modern here though. Human nature is fundamentally knowable and mundane. That is why being nice to each other is important. That is the implication of historical materialism.

          • UlyssesT
            ·
            edit-2
            19 days ago

            deleted by creator

            • UnicodeHamSic [he/him]
              ·
              1 year ago

              Do you think I understand what you mean by repeating the mantra? Is repeating it helping? I don't think the criticism you are making is justified yourblogic you are using

              • UlyssesT
                ·
                edit-2
                19 days ago

                deleted by creator

        • UnicodeHamSic [he/him]
          ·
          1 year ago

          Bojack has just as many monsters working and funding it. We just don't know about it. Every show is made by monsters. Arthur or sesame street as well.

          If you think I am mad that are canceling Rick and Marty you are protecting.

          • UlyssesT
            ·
            edit-2
            19 days ago

            deleted by creator

            • UnicodeHamSic [he/him]
              ·
              1 year ago

              Given that we are living on a world that has and is facing apocalypse so powerful people can have treats they don't enjoy there is some artistic merrit there.

              I am saying the scope of the conversation keeps sliding back and forth in ways that are not useful or interesting

              • UlyssesT
                ·
                edit-2
                19 days ago

                deleted by creator

                • UnicodeHamSic [he/him]
                  ·
                  1 year ago

                  This is not a twitch debate. Moving the goalposts isn't real in a conversation. A silly cartoon can have intresting themes and remain unimportant. You can portray a thing without endorsement. I don't see the point of consuming treats if you are going to give it a friendly read

                  • UlyssesT
                    ·
                    edit-2
                    19 days ago

                    deleted by creator

                    • UnicodeHamSic [he/him]
                      ·
                      1 year ago

                      So we are just disagreeing over weather a show having a character being miserable countd as it showing them being miserable?

                      • UlyssesT
                        ·
                        edit-2
                        19 days ago

                        deleted by creator