• 420blazeit69 [he/him]
    ·
    edit-2
    1 year ago

    If your partner lies to you about something in order to get sex, even just implicitely, then that is non-consensual by definition.

    Short of very extreme examples (STDs, impersonation, Spycops) this is just lying. It's still bad, but it's nowhere near the same level of severity as rape. This is just like how assault and murder are treated quite differently.

    Also consider the implications of re-criminalizing adultery. That doesn't seem like a good route to pursue.

    • NapkinKeyLime [none/use name]
      ·
      1 year ago

      Short of very extreme examples (STDs, impersonation, Spycops) this is just lying. It’s still bad, but it’s nowhere near the same level of severity as rape.

      Once again, you're trying to say that non-consensual must equal rape and that's just not the case.

      Also consider the implications of re-criminalizing adultery. That doesn’t seem like a good route to pursue.

      No one wants to re-criminalize adultery. Literally no one is bringing this up but you.

      • 420blazeit69 [he/him]
        ·
        1 year ago

        What type of non-consensual sex would not be rape?

        And if you're saying cheating = non-consensual sex, and you presumably think non-consensual sex is a crime...

        • NapkinKeyLime [none/use name]
          ·
          1 year ago

          What type of non-consensual sex would not be rape?

          Literally this entire scenario we're describing. It's the same reason why signing a contract that had invisible ink makes the contract unenforceable. Let's turn this around, why is willing exposing your partner to STDs without their knowledge not a violation of consent?

          And if you’re saying cheating = non-consensual sex, and you presumably think non-consensual sex is a crime…

          Legality != morality. I can think something is morally atrocious while still thinking it should be legal, or at least not punishable.