Bad construction comrade.
Your argument is paraphrased thus:
Egyptian famines are a result of a lack of wheat, therefore any country that doesn't grow wheat is in a famine.
The welfare system in the stated Nordic countries is indeed funded by imperialism. But the reverse is not necessarily true. Some imperial countries do not distribute the gains among the citizens.
Post hoc fallacy here..in these cases, the welfare state does develop after imperialism, but that doesn't mean that imperialism created the welfare state...
Some countries have social programs without ever being imperialist. It just means less wealth to redistribute
Bad construction comrade. Your argument is paraphrased thus:
Egyptian famines are a result of a lack of wheat, therefore any country that doesn't grow wheat is in a famine.
The welfare system in the stated Nordic countries is indeed funded by imperialism. But the reverse is not necessarily true. Some imperial countries do not distribute the gains among the citizens.
Post hoc fallacy here..in these cases, the welfare state does develop after imperialism, but that doesn't mean that imperialism created the welfare state...
Some countries have social programs without ever being imperialist. It just means less wealth to redistribute
deleted by creator