... it ran out days ago (assuming it didn't implode):

  1. The 96 hours thing comes from the Oceangate website factsheet. Do you think they ACTUALLY tested that by putting five people in it for 96 hours?

  2. Whatever went wrong with the sub (electrical failure, implosion) probably compromised the oxygen supply or made it redundant.

  3. The 96 hours assumes they breathed evenly. Do you think they weren't panicking and trashing and screaming and hyperventilating?

  4. Oxygen is only one part of the problem, the other is dangerous CO2 buildup. These subs have CO2 removal systems that need replacing every 10 hours or so. They would be inhaling dangerous levels of CO2 long before they ran out of oxygen.

They're mega, mega dead.

  • footfaults [none/use name]
    ·
    1 year ago

    People have been fixating on certain details that I think are kind of silly, like them being bolted in from the outside

    This isn't my take, SubBrief on YouTube brought this up on his video, but being bolted in and no way to escape in an oxygen rich environment is how the astronauts in Apollo 1 burned to death.

    The point being that this company chose to ignore every engineering lesson that was paid for with lives.

    It's the final logical conclusion of "move fast and break things" brainworms