If Stalin didn’t stop at Berlin America would have eaten shit for like a year until they built more nukes which they had a monopoly on at the time.

They would have used them.

I don’t see a path to victory there unless it’s acceptable to be losing like two entire cities a year (I honestly have no idea how many nukes could be built a year at that time, I say two because that’s how many were built for Japan) to a nuclear and bloodthirsty empire in its prime.

I know it’s a meme. But I see it said enough I wanted to hear what people actually thought on the matter memes aside.

Edit: lots of good takes and I’ve learned some stuff, thanks for all the responses.

  • Judge_Jury [comrade/them, he/him]
    ·
    1 year ago

    My serious take, as much as I hate having those, is that it's hard enough to get a comprehensive view of the present, harder to get one of the past, and harder still to make consistently accurate predictions about the future

    So for me, the idea of using a view of the past to predict an alternate present is just a genre of fiction