69
Rant: "Vote Blue or you are privileged" is genocidal imo - Lemmygrad
lemmygrad.mlIm not going to pull punches on this rant. I am so exhausted by this rhetoric
and unfortunately it is pervasive in my personal life and online. I spend most
of my productive time reviewing literature on various global issues. Namely land
grab discourse, genocide studies, conservation efforts, state development
policy, IFI reports etc etc. Let me tell you something about the lives of rural
and Indigenous people in the global south. They get their homes burned down and
murdered in their sleep. Their lands are stolen from them with techniques
perfected by colonial powers, especially from US settler colonialism. The state
will steal their lands and “preserve it” for use of private capital, for white
settlers, or to create a national park or preserves that wealthy foriegners can
hunt game and so they can parade to the world how “modern” they are becoming. If
they cannot steal land outright they will use other more complicated manners to
incentivise rural people to be tied into market relations, such as dependence on
ecotourism or even biochar and other technologies presented as liberatory or as
needed due to damages colonialism has done. “A bit of colonialism will help your
colonialism problem,” if you will. These relations will contradict and then
corrode their lifeways and distracted from effective traditional methods because
white tourists don’t want to see the cattle of pastoralists when on vacation.
They are also shamed by the excess wealth of tourists, and the settlers that
facilitate tourism, encouraging them to become more enfranchised into modernity
so their lands will either become vulnerable to direct theft or the market
relations will mold them into what settlers want them to do for the benifit of
their estates. These extreme minority settlers often own like half of an entire
county, while the county next door is over half conservation area. This means
fewer lands for grazing and fewer water sources available for rural people. It
leads to starvation and death, especially during dry periods such as the current
drought in east Africa, all while the state concern trolls about food security
and executes the development dance to attract aid and FDI. It also means that
lands are degraded by over use because these people are being choked out of
their ancestral lands. The state and white settlers then blame the pastoralists
and forest dwellers and weaponize Human Rights against them, saying the rural
peoples are preventing the states quest for water security as they redirect all
waters to metro areas and settler estates. All of this is the genocidal process
of primative accumulation or accumulation by dispossession. It is a privilege I
am able to research these situations. It is a privilege that I am able to work
with organizations that work with local Tribes on the issues they are concerned
about. It is a privilege I am a grad student that is paid to do this, although
our union has to fight the university for a fraction of a living wage. I am not
privileged to not vote Blue. It is more like a curse of understanding. Who do
you think backs these violent efforts of dispossession? USAID is never far away.
The EU is never far away. The IFI are always right there. Conservation as we
know it was created in North America to conquer the continent and take the land
from Indigenous peoples and it has exported these methods abroad. All of this is
supported by institutions and policies that democrats and republicans alike
believe in and enable globally. It is supported by finance capital which is the
foundation of the present democratic party Let me tell you what people who vote
blue do about this. Kenya or some other post colonial state will massacre people
and burn down their homes and create a national park. Netflix will then hire
Obama to narrate a docuseriese on the glorious national parks of the world. Blue
voters will then consume the erasure and genocide of rural people as feel-good,
green™ content with satisfaction that the world is becoming a better place.
That’s it. Then they go vote blue. Anyone who says I am privileged to not vote
blue has no clue or no care regarding how the world works and is a combination
being hopelessly US centric, too focused on bourgeoisie partisanship and
embarrassingly naive about the world. Voting blue is the opposite of solidarity.
The people who say they are not privileged enough to not vote Blue fail to see
their own privilege of living in the Disney land of the global north. What ever
gains they think Democrats will give them will either never happen or will be
cut from the flesh of people they are happy to sacrifice. I will not be extorted
by bourgeoisie partisans. My moral worth and political identify is mine to
create, not theirs to demand. My concern is with the fundamental machinations of
capital and the devestating impact it has on people while it reproduces itself,
and it is most destructive in places far from the minds of democrats regardless
of issues in the US. I’m not going to be tricked into supporting a party that
enables the process of accumulation by dispossession, and that stands on a
foundation of genocide. They only have moral arguments but they do not have
moral standing.
solid analysis by a comrade
There is a balance between how much harm you are preventing by voting for social democrats versus how much harm you are contributing in re-enforcing the system as it exists. For me, in my country, I vote for the soc-dems despite the internal conflict it causes me, to prevent things like the total privatisation of healthcare and total inaction on climate change. I’m not sure, from afar, how much damage the US Democrats prevent. The only reason I could see for voting for them is the insanity and borderline fascism of the GOP, but again that is obviously a product of the system as it exists.
Really what is missing here is proper organisation within the left. If the left withheld their vote in an organised and collective manner, that could be a way to exert real power - the kind of power that would be worth sacrificing the scraps from the table that soc-dems throw. If it’s not organised and the perception is just ‘the youth don’t vote because they can’t be bothered’, then it’s probably valid to argue that not voting is cutting off one’s nose to spite the face, because nothing positive is going to come of it, whereas it may produce significant harm. We can say that electoral politics are worthless, but in reality they do have a significance that can’t be ignored, even if their not the pathway to real change.
Of course the other argument against voting that leftists have is that acceleration would benefit us, but I think that’s a highly dubious and naive argument, based more in wishful thinking than any evidence.
Having said all that, I would never shame anyone for not voting. On a moral level, it is disgusting to actively re-enforce the system. But to be completely realist about it, if there’s no strategy and no organisation in the refusal, then it’s not going to produce a desirable effect.
There is at least the beginning of organization in the refusal by voting for third parties with clear leftist platforms.
In most Western countries the ‘far’ left party can usually get anywhere from 5-15% of the vote. That kind of vote would sink the Democrats and maybe shift them, or at least the Overton window, leftwards. But I think third party votes in the US are much smaller right? At least for the left wing parties.
Best case scenario it would take decades for the dem party to bow the knee, they dont care.
possibly faster depending on events. a major recession would cause another leftward swing as people look for alternatives to the democrats.
If they were already extracting conscessions, we wouldn't be debating it. My argument is that they can with a bit more support.