Well put, for these reasons honestly I can't ever see the diminishing of the white, western demographics as a bad thing. They're not "racially inferior" or whatnot- hell, my partner is white- but statistically speaking, culturally speaking, within the world system and particularly the settler-regimes and imperial cores they have created, they are more likely to be reactionary and opposed to equality than other groups as I see it.
Until white supremacy and imperialism are completely eradicated as global systems and social diseases, I think that'll be just how it is. Of course, white individuals like anyone else should be judged by their own personal merits- but as a "race" (the system they created), as a separate group (for all that whiteness is incredibly arbitrary) it'll take a long time and a lot of changes to return them, and the nations/regions that make up the imperial core as well, to come back down to earth with the rest of the world IMO (not to say "humanity was united before the cracker nations attacked," but the scars they have left are certainly the most egregious, widespread, and deep of them all IMO).
The Soviets and the Warsaw Pact strike me as the only group amongst the west to truly try to mend that divide (and the crimes and resulting social corruption of the Russian/eastern European nations was always far, far, far lesser than that of the west Europeans). And even then, so much was undone with their collapse- as I see it even, I'd argue that- while not the primary reason, their whiteness- and thus the ambitions of certain elements of society, to "rejoin the white, western, imperialist bloc," etc- played a role undermining the union to begin with.
Well put, for these reasons honestly I can't ever see the diminishing of the white, western demographics as a bad thing. They're not "racially inferior" or whatnot- hell, my partner is white- but statistically speaking, culturally speaking, within the world system and particularly the settler-regimes and imperial cores they have created, they are more likely to be reactionary and opposed to equality than other groups as I see it.
Until white supremacy and imperialism are completely eradicated as global systems and social diseases, I think that'll be just how it is. Of course, white individuals like anyone else should be judged by their own personal merits- but as a "race" (the system they created), as a separate group (for all that whiteness is incredibly arbitrary) it'll take a long time and a lot of changes to return them, and the nations/regions that make up the imperial core as well, to come back down to earth with the rest of the world IMO (not to say "humanity was united before the cracker nations attacked," but the scars they have left are certainly the most egregious, widespread, and deep of them all IMO).
The Soviets and the Warsaw Pact strike me as the only group amongst the west to truly try to mend that divide (and the crimes and resulting social corruption of the Russian/eastern European nations was always far, far, far lesser than that of the west Europeans). And even then, so much was undone with their collapse- as I see it even, I'd argue that- while not the primary reason, their whiteness- and thus the ambitions of certain elements of society, to "rejoin the white, western, imperialist bloc," etc- played a role undermining the union to begin with.