• Greg@lemmy.ca
    ·
    1 year ago

    ...instead of this poison laden crap.

    The dose makes the poison. They're taking a science-based process to update the maximum residue limit.

    ...don’t give a damn about us, the planet, or biodiversity.

    Significantly more land would have to be allocated to agriculture to produce the same amount of food without pesticides. That's not good for the planet or biodiversity.

    • Cyborganism@lemmy.ca
      ·
      1 year ago

      Yeah but what if by increasing its usage, it means that you get more into the underground water supply and you end up with elevated concentration in drinking water because of this?

      • Greg@lemmy.ca
        ·
        1 year ago

        If it's dangerous then obviously stop doing it. But use science to test your hypothesis

        • Avid Amoeba@lemmy.ca
          ·
          edit-2
          1 year ago

          When Syngenta is involved, I'm extremely skeptical that the process is scientific or rather that the variables optimized for are people's or the environment's health. The dose isn't an on/off switch, it isn't boolean. Given Syngenta's track record, I'm guessing that they're optimizing for how much they can sell before the damage is apparent to most. I do believe they're scientifically establishing these amounts.