I'm seeing some real time, grade-A consent manufacturing regarding this massive crowdstrike outage. Every article I see blames Microsoft. I have no love for Microsoft, but they were not to blame. The people who are too blame are crowdstrike, the software company who deployed the broken update that caused the outage.
* Puts on immaculately thought out tinfoil hat *
Crowdstrike is more a piece of US surveillance tech than it is an actual security suite. In essence it can take any data from a device it is installed on and can execute any command on those devices (due to the way the software very tightly integrated with the windows operating system, bypassing security on the OS). A powerful tool when you consider that the US government can subpoena any us corporation to hand over the information they hold.
Now, crowdstrike had a huge market share, but you can bet that after this event people are going to be less willing to use it, and this will result in the US losing a huge part of its surveillance network. People don't care what security suite they use, so long as it works, so people are going to switch.
Cue the absolute deluge of articles I've been seeing blaming this on Microsoft. An operating system so ingrained into the business world that no-one is going to switch to an alternative, no matter how much they fuck up. They can take the heat and mitigate the damage to crowdstrike. Thus preserving the US state surveillance appetatus.
* Tin foil hat removed and placed back into its extremely well thought out box *
What do people think?
It is micro$oft's fault actually for having a major hand in building this current hell of proprietary software and cloud bullshit we're all trapped in.
Fine, but I don't think that really addresses the specific thing I'm getting at here.
Even if cloudstrike does go under as a company it won't really change the surveillance "security" situation because companies will still prefer to pay cloudstrike's successor rather than paying actual employee(s) to do cybersecurity.
Oh for sure, but I'm sure Langley would rather not have the hassle.