I like to grade these sorts on a "time to Hitler" ie, how many comments in for the lib to get with it. Commenter here is running down the clock 'till they start ranting about removed.
Geugenics is not a word and is basically unintelligible. You don’t get to act like an intellectual or call other people grammar Nazis if you can even write a legible word.
We’re you trying to say Genetics??? How did you get geugenics?????
Also “What are we even discussing?” How about you answer the question originally posed to you instead of running away like a coward. You don’t even have the backbone to stand by your nonsensical logic and takes.
Holy crap dude, all i did was accidentally slip in the letter G in the front. There, now you learnt something.
I don't even know why we're discussing it, but everything seems to boil down to race in these comments. I'm not the one bringing it up. All I wanted to discuss is Ukrianes right to defend herself and her people.
What? 'Mongrel' is a racially charged insult to you? It's not to me but then again, race is not something i base my worldview around unlike you i guess. Don't tell me your American.
people who make claims like "i just don't think about race" are
A) almost invariably white people who are not impacted by racism
and
B) are taking the path of least resistance to 'opposing' racism. they're acknowledging racism is bad (sometimes) and then deciding the solution is to personally stop paying attention to race instead of actively working to stop racism
at best, this an individualist approach to a systemic issue (read: worthless). at worst, this is just a lazy excuse to continue being casually racist and go along to get along with society's worst impulses.
Anyway a mongrel is a dog, and claiming that a people should be massacred and not have the right to defend themselves is on the level of intelligence of a dog.
You commies are rich, but for sure I'll humor you. What was the thing that you found not to be 'logically consistent'(illogical as you would normally say).
Everyone has a right to defend themselves, it's a human right. I just took it for granted that you understood that, but I also raise that you might have a different view on the matter.
lmao jesus god you are dumb as shit, how do you manage not to choke to death on your own spit?
That's your idea of 'engaging in good faith'?
The situation in Ukrinae is not at all similar to the situation in Korea. Still I have tried to give as good an answer as I can: every people have a right to defend themselves.
there are like four hundred comments replying to you in absolute good faith
mine wasn't and never will be one of those because i don't believe you have the capacity to learn after seeing you refuse to do so this entire thread. i am being mean to you because i don't like you. that's all.
Lend lease helped the Soviets a lot but that's where comparison ends. Without lend lease they could still have possibly won with even greater losses. The aid to Ukraine on the other hand is just funneling money into a lost war with no chance of winning, keeping the zombie of Ukrainian resistance alive, lining the pockets of the military industrial complex and refusing to seek peaceful negotiation. These are not the same.
Removed by mod
"Muh impure genes!" Least fascistic liberal, right here.
You bring geugenics into this it's on you, I'm implying nothing
The fuck do you think mongrel means?
Geugenics 😂
When did they stop teaching Nazis spelling? Or are you still in 2nd grade?
I like to grade these sorts on a "time to Hitler" ie, how many comments in for the lib to get
with it. Commenter here is running down the clock 'till they start ranting about removed.
Not a nazi. The only nazi here is you, you grammar-nazi lmao. Anyway wth are we even discussing anymore
Geugenics is not a word and is basically unintelligible. You don’t get to act like an intellectual or call other people grammar Nazis if you can even write a legible word.
We’re you trying to say Genetics??? How did you get geugenics?????
Also “What are we even discussing?” How about you answer the question originally posed to you instead of running away like a coward. You don’t even have the backbone to stand by your nonsensical logic and takes.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Eugenics?wprov=sfla1
Holy crap dude, all i did was accidentally slip in the letter G in the front. There, now you learnt something.
I don't even know why we're discussing it, but everything seems to boil down to race in these comments. I'm not the one bringing it up. All I wanted to discuss is Ukrianes right to defend herself and her people.
Everything is nazis to you people. Like how everything is an SJW conspiracy to the alt-right. A somewhat amusing parallel I find.
You right now.
What? 'Mongrel' is a racially charged insult to you? It's not to me but then again, race is not something i base my worldview around unlike you i guess. Don't tell me your American.
lmao "i'm so enlightened i don't even think about race" fuck off you
And that's a bad thing to you? lmao wth is going on here
so to be sincere for a second
people who make claims like "i just don't think about race" are
A) almost invariably white people who are not impacted by racism
and
B) are taking the path of least resistance to 'opposing' racism. they're acknowledging racism is bad (sometimes) and then deciding the solution is to personally stop paying attention to race instead of actively working to stop racism
at best, this an individualist approach to a systemic issue (read: worthless). at worst, this is just a lazy excuse to continue being casually racist and go along to get along with society's worst impulses.
Not everyone is American you fucking twpsyn. What do you think mongrel means?
Haha I'm a what?!
Anyway a mongrel is a dog, and claiming that a people should be massacred and not have the right to defend themselves is on the level of intelligence of a dog.
You read it, you are a twpsyn.
What kind of dog is a mongrel?
Ok sure. Idk some kind of dog I guess
Mongrel is a catch-all term for dogs that are crossbreeds.
Comparing people to mongrels has a long history of use as a racially tinged insult, UK hate speech laws even class it as a racial slur.
It's a coward's way of being racist with plausible deniability.
You're the fuck obsessed with race, not me. I never brought it up even. Goddamn your blind.
I feel very sorry for your parents. Even if they're nazis like you, clearly they failed to make you even an impressive nazi.
Idk, there is one thing that's impressive:
I have not seen someone so smugly incorrect as this poster since I stopped browsing Reddit.
We're looking at the personification of a Quora post.
Like, the concept of dramatic irony writ mortal.
The Dunning-Kruger effect made flesh.
You're right, that "not a nazi, you (nazi popularized slur)" poster is exceptional there.
The only one talking race is you, and that truly, if anything, makes you sound like a nazi. Enough dude.
"No you're the real Nazi!"
Doesn't make for a convincing argument when you've already had it explained to you why what you said was racist.
And what was this 'racist thing'?
Jesus Christ, are you illiterate or something?
Okay, go get someone who can explain the long words to you.
Found them?
Have them read the following out to you.
Any more questions?
Removed by mod
Here's an example of it being used as a slur
Here's an Irish politician talking about her child being abused as a "mongrel" to prove it's not just a UK thing
Here's a link to a Nazi children's book titled "the mongrel"
If you refer to a human as a mongrel, you are definitely making a pejorative comment about that person's origins.
(often derogatory) Someone or something of mixed kind or uncertain origin
Since you're a fan of quoting Wikipedia - In December 1939, Himmler declared that racial assessments were essential to avoid "mongrel types from emerging in the territories that are to be newly settled. I want to create a blond province."
Precedent in UK law for hatecrime charges for calling someone a mongrel will be harder to track down.
Removed by mod
This is a really weak response.
You can't refute any of the points above so all you can do is handwring and wail.
Uh uh some kind of dog ig uh uh
“A somewhat amusing parallel”.
Man thinks he’s a profound intellectual making groundbreaking social discoveries.
No? Just an absolutely simple amsuing surface observation. And that came across as complex to you apparently.
You're masturbating so fast and hard to your own belief in your own smartness that you might catch fire from all the friction.
I don't want to know what's on your freak mind, and especially nothing to do with masturbation.
Who you calling "you people?"
Read you Commies, can't say I'm a fan but I'm willing to broaden my horizon.
You're not everything.
Crazy, tangential question... does this apply to the DPRK, in your eyes, too?
Sure is a crazy question, right, so I'll just move on.
And you are a spineless and hypocritical lib.
What’s wrong with being logically consistent? You scared or something?
You commies are rich, but for sure I'll humor you. What was the thing that you found not to be 'logically consistent'(illogical as you would normally say).
Answer their question first. They asked you something first.
So nothing, thanks very constructive.
They claimed their question was a crazy tangent, I agreed since I don't know what it had to do with anything so I kinda ignored it, there done.
LOL either stop dodging the question or fuck off, coward
Guess they decided to fuck off lol
Everyone has a right to defend themselves, it's a human right. I just took it for granted that you understood that, but I also raise that you might have a different view on the matter.
lmao jesus god you are dumb as shit, how do you manage not to choke to death on your own spit?
Oh well please explain then, you high and mighty intellectual communist fuck
you keep asking people to engage with you without engaging in good faith first. no one wants to waste their time on a brick wall champ
it's pretty clear what the connection is; similarly, it's extremely clear why you continue to avoid the question
That's your idea of 'engaging in good faith'?
The situation in Ukrinae is not at all similar to the situation in Korea. Still I have tried to give as good an answer as I can: every people have a right to defend themselves.
That is quite simply the best answer I can give.
there are like four hundred comments replying to you in absolute good faith
mine wasn't and never will be one of those because i don't believe you have the capacity to learn after seeing you refuse to do so this entire thread. i am being mean to you because i don't like you. that's all.
Well guess what I don't like you neither you commie fuck, but don't come to me acting like I should behave in good faith
don't go crying about people treating you as you deserve then
ps
Coward
Alesdy answered the absurd question, next
deleted by creator
And what makes you think they don't?
deleted by creator
They do, it's a hard war for survival. Soviets did the same against the fascists.
Are you talking about the lend lease?
Yes, clearly
Lend lease helped the Soviets a lot but that's where comparison ends. Without lend lease they could still have possibly won with even greater losses. The aid to Ukraine on the other hand is just funneling money into a lost war with no chance of winning, keeping the zombie of Ukrainian resistance alive, lining the pockets of the military industrial complex and refusing to seek peaceful negotiation. These are not the same.