Source: https://lemmy.ml/post/3151461
you mongrel
"Muh impure genes!" Least fascistic liberal, right here.
Geugenics 😂
When did they stop teaching Nazis spelling? Or are you still in 2nd grade?
I like to grade these sorts on a "time to Hitler" ie, how many comments in for the lib to get
with it. Commenter here is running down the clock 'till they start ranting about removed.Not a nazi. The only nazi here is you, you grammar-nazi lmao. Anyway wth are we even discussing anymore
Geugenics is not a word and is basically unintelligible. You don’t get to act like an intellectual or call other people grammar Nazis if you can even write a legible word.
We’re you trying to say Genetics??? How did you get geugenics?????
Also “What are we even discussing?” How about you answer the question originally posed to you instead of running away like a coward. You don’t even have the backbone to stand by your nonsensical logic and takes.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Eugenics?wprov=sfla1
Holy crap dude, all i did was accidentally slip in the letter G in the front. There, now you learnt something.
I don't even know why we're discussing it, but everything seems to boil down to race in these comments. I'm not the one bringing it up. All I wanted to discuss is Ukrianes right to defend herself and her people.
Everything is nazis to you people. Like how everything is an SJW conspiracy to the alt-right. A somewhat amusing parallel I find.
"Why does everyone call me a Nazi? All I did was use an insult that hinges on the concept of racial purity."You right now.
What? 'Mongrel' is a racially charged insult to you? It's not to me but then again, race is not something i base my worldview around unlike you i guess. Don't tell me your American.
so to be sincere for a second
people who make claims like "i just don't think about race" are
A) almost invariably white people who are not impacted by racism
and
B) are taking the path of least resistance to 'opposing' racism. they're acknowledging racism is bad (sometimes) and then deciding the solution is to personally stop paying attention to race instead of actively working to stop racism
at best, this an individualist approach to a systemic issue (read: worthless). at worst, this is just a lazy excuse to continue being casually racist and go along to get along with society's worst impulses.
Not everyone is American you fucking twpsyn. What do you think mongrel means?
Haha I'm a what?!
Anyway a mongrel is a dog, and claiming that a people should be massacred and not have the right to defend themselves is on the level of intelligence of a dog.
You read it, you are a twpsyn.
What kind of dog is a mongrel?
Mongrel is a catch-all term for dogs that are crossbreeds.
Comparing people to mongrels has a long history of use as a racially tinged insult, UK hate speech laws even class it as a racial slur.
You're the fuck obsessed with race, not me. I never brought it up even. Goddamn your blind.
I feel very sorry for your parents. Even if they're nazis like you, clearly they failed to make you even an impressive nazi.
Idk, there is one thing that's impressive:
I have not seen someone so smugly incorrect as this poster since I stopped browsing Reddit.
We're looking at the personification of a Quora post.
Like, the concept of dramatic irony writ mortal.
The Dunning-Kruger effect made flesh.
You're right, that "not a nazi, you (nazi popularized slur)" poster is exceptional there.
The only one talking race is you, and that truly, if anything, makes you sound like a nazi. Enough dude.
"No you're the real Nazi!"
Doesn't make for a convincing argument when you've already had it explained to you why what you said was racist.
says racist thing
"Why is everyone calling me racist? Must be because they're delusional."
Jesus Christ, are you illiterate or something?
Okay, go get someone who can explain the long words to you.
Found them?
Have them read the following out to you.
Mongrel is a catch-all term for dogs that are crossbreeds.
Comparing people to mongrels has a long history of use as a racially tinged insult, UK hate speech laws even class it as a racial slur.
Any more questions?
Here's an example of it being used as a slur
Here's a link to a Nazi children's book titled "the mongrel"
(often derogatory) Someone or something of mixed kind or uncertain origin
Since you're a fan of quoting Wikipedia - In December 1939, Himmler declared that racial assessments were essential to avoid "mongrel types from emerging in the territories that are to be newly settled. I want to create a blond province."
Precedent in UK law for hatecrime charges for calling someone a mongrel will be harder to track down.
This is a really weak response.
You can't refute any of the points above so all you can do is handwring and wail.
“A somewhat amusing parallel”.
Man thinks he’s a profound intellectual making groundbreaking social discoveries.
No? Just an absolutely simple amsuing surface observation. And that came across as complex to you apparently.
You're masturbating so fast and hard to your own belief in your own smartness that you might catch fire from all the friction.
I don't want to know what's on your freak mind, and especially nothing to do with masturbation.
Read you Commies, can't say I'm a fan but I'm willing to broaden my horizon.
Crazy, tangential question... does this apply to the DPRK, in your eyes, too?
And you are a spineless and hypocritical lib.
What’s wrong with being logically consistent? You scared or something?
You commies are rich, but for sure I'll humor you. What was the thing that you found not to be 'logically consistent'(illogical as you would normally say).
Answer their question first. They asked you something first.
So nothing, thanks very constructive.
They claimed their question was a crazy tangent, I agreed since I don't know what it had to do with anything so I kinda ignored it, there done.
LOL either stop dodging the question or fuck off, coward
Everyone has a right to defend themselves, it's a human right. I just took it for granted that you understood that, but I also raise that you might have a different view on the matter.
I don't know what it had to do with anything
lmao jesus god you are dumb as shit, how do you manage not to choke to death on your own spit?
Oh well please explain then, you high and mighty intellectual communist fuck
you keep asking people to engage with you without engaging in good faith first. no one wants to waste their time on a brick wall champ
it's pretty clear what the connection is; similarly, it's extremely clear why you continue to avoid the question
lmao jesus god you are dumb as shit, how do you manage not to choke to death on your own spit?
That's your idea of 'engaging in good faith'?
The situation in Ukrinae is not at all similar to the situation in Korea. Still I have tried to give as good an answer as I can: every people have a right to defend themselves.
That is quite simply the best answer I can give.
there are like four hundred comments replying to you in absolute good faith
mine wasn't and never will be one of those because i don't believe you have the capacity to learn after seeing you refuse to do so this entire thread. i am being mean to you because i don't like you. that's all.
Well guess what I don't like you neither you commie fuck, but don't come to me acting like I should behave in good faith
idk, maybe something to do with the billions of dollars worth of western equipment they rely on
They do, it's a hard war for survival. Soviets did the same against the fascists.
Lend lease helped the Soviets a lot but that's where comparison ends. Without lend lease they could still have possibly won with even greater losses. The aid to Ukraine on the other hand is just funneling money into a lost war with no chance of winning, keeping the zombie of Ukrainian resistance alive, lining the pockets of the military industrial complex and refusing to seek peaceful negotiation. These are not the same.
I don't think anything other nukes will make Ukraine "win". I can also bet that Ukraine has asked for nukes Atleast once.
And for preemtive nuclear strikes on Russia, even before the SMO.
Ukraine once had nukes and gave them away in a bid to ease tension with their neighbors and the west
There were Soviet nukes placed in Ukraine with a preplanned trajectory to hit the west and needed authorization from the CPSU in Moscow to be fired.
Ukraine never had nukes. They didn't have the ability to maintain and control the arsenal that was placed there.
Tbf they probably could've hacked them into something usable but by that time they would've been invaded by a coalition of the US and Russia. America wanted all nukes under control of their puppet regime in Russia.
Well is there a difference between asking for a nuke straight up and asking for a no fly zone over Ukraine where US planes would shoot down Russian ones? Not really. Because if a NFZ was established and Russia flew into it or vice versa as soon as the aircraft engage that's supposed to be immediate war posturing and a reason for nuclear war. Which is of course why the NFZ was never granted (a fucking INSANE ask btw in the middle of a war with a nuclear power). But that was basically Ukraine asking the US "hey, can you make the planes stop and if they try to stop you stopping then, you know, nuke them? But just a little! A baby nuke!"
The instance seems fine to me. It's this individual that is very disturbing. (I guess every instance have them to some extent)
There's a lot of reddit refugees on the normie feds. Hopefully that explains it enough!
BEEP BEEP BEEP PARTICLE DETECTED
lanyard warriors or what?