- cross-posted to:
- technology
https://archive.is/2024.08.05-032033/https://nationalinterest.org/blog/buzz/us-military-freaked-lasers-are-no-secret-weapon-against-hypersonic-missiles-207436
https://archive.is/2024.08.05-032033/https://nationalinterest.org/blog/buzz/us-military-freaked-lasers-are-no-secret-weapon-against-hypersonic-missiles-207436
CIWS's aren't very effective.
Nope. Turns out that adding a few ounces of lead or hardened steel to the milliseconds before impact doesn't do much when the missiles are designed to force their way through thousands of pounds of air per second.
Same reason they aren't effective against jet aircraft. The bullets don't have enough momentum to keep going straight in their trajectory, hit the fuselage, penetrate and do damage inside. Instead, as soon as they are caught in the missile's flow field, they are swept along with it.
The only way CIWs can be effective is if you shoot them from particular angles (i.e. facing the front of the missile primarily), from a close distance (meaning the missile might still pose a danger even if destroyed/damaged), and if you use a lot of them simultaneously to create a wall of bullets where some will hopefully damage the missile in a critical way, as the missile's path passes through them.
Otherwise, you need to hope that whatever is coming at your CIW, is going to slow down and fly low and straight before impact, so the bullets can actually have a chance of penetrating its flow field. But that's not something that hypersonic missiles do. Instead they use their last stage to get even faster, and approach the target vertically from high above.
CIWS are there to shoot down cruise missiles, which go reltively slow compared to ballistic missiles. Maybe destroy small drones.
Yeah, sorry, I wasn't clear. I was talking about hypersonic missiles in response to the thread above.