I'm writing a nonfiction with a focus on history and have one chapter lacking in length. Of course I am working on expanding it, but I fear it might not be quite enough to fix the gap (currently it's a 40-page gap).
Through my research work in college and article writing, I noticed that sacred attention is given to the symmetry of parts and sections. Also most nonfiction material I've read has been quite consistent in distributing the book over chapters more or less equal in size.
I'm aware that I don't need a perfectly equal division, but how much discrepancy is tolerable?
Writing with a focus on length strikes me as an approach that will lead to a lot of filler, unless you're a person who generally writes way too much.
No, absolutely not. Write what you have to say on a topic, but absolutely do not try to pad in order to meet an arbitrary length goal. Some topics are just less complicated than others, and that's fine.
Good point. There is one section that I can possibly move to the shorter chapter.
You can absolutely have chapters of different length. Don't waste the reader's time by padding it out for the sake of some weird aesthetic principle.
