• TankieTanuki [he/him]
      hexagon
      ·
      edit-2
      1 month ago

      DDNS doesn't work behind CGNAT. Never heard of ngrok; google says it might work. I'm trying to do something with WireGuard.

      • flan [they/them]
        ·
        1 month ago

        they're using cgnat and turning off ipv6? what the hell..

      • Vent@lemm.ee
        ·
        1 month ago

        Cloudflare tunnel (aka a reverse proxy, like ngrok) will also likely work for your mystery project, and it’s free. VPN is more secure, but as always, it's a trade-off between the security of a vpn and the convinence of a reverse proxy that's available on the open internet.

        • TankieTanuki [he/him]
          hexagon
          ·
          edit-2
          1 month ago

          A reverse proxy like nginx?

          Basically, I want to move files between my NAS (behind CGNAT) and webserver and rsync isn't cutting it. I think WireGuard will be best, then I can use my existing NFS and Kerberos infrastructure.

          • wheresmysurplusvalue [comrade/them]
            ·
            1 month ago

            Do you need a static IP or could you get away with using dynamic DNS like duckdns? I think wireguard allows you to use a hostname instead of IP address. The wireguard peers would have static private IPs in the VPN address space. I had a much simpler setup than you, but this is what I was doing before tailscale.

            • TankieTanuki [he/him]
              hexagon
              ·
              edit-2
              1 month ago

              A dynamic IP would work; I just need an IP that is unique to my router and isn't shared by a dozen other households---I don't know what the term for that is.

              There is a way to make it work with WireGuard using something called MASQUERADE, I'm learning.