Read this: I don't want this to turn into a struggle session so please do not engage in such a way.

Does Marxism being "scientific" matter? Or does this need to want to cling to science to prove its legitimacy actually hinder its effect? I've been wrestling with this question for the past day and I still don't have a concrete opinion.

  • ingirumimus [none/use name]
    ·
    4 months ago

    lol this is more or less what I was trying to say but much more clear and concise. I think you're absolutely right: Marxism is a methodology, and one that has to be applied differently at different places and times to be effective. Its a tactical mistake to think of it as a science

    • FungiDebord [none/use name]
      ·
      edit-2
      4 months ago

      Ty and well said. Any concision is just the result/blessing of my not having had engaged w/ Theory in a long time.