My point is kids shouldn't be playing full contact football, regardless of whether or not their parents approve. The long term ramifications are not something they can consent to. It's like giving kids alcohol after "explaining the risks," except alcohol is safer than multiple concussions. Even if you explain to a teen that they can develop lifelong alcohol addiction and damage their liver, they still do not have the ability to make an informed decision. "My parents told me about the risks and gave me permission to binge drink if I want to" is not a policy I'd trust.
I do not understand why we continue to allow full contact football when it so it's so dangerous to the players, especially children.
My point is kids shouldn't be playing full contact football, regardless of whether or not their parents approve. The long term ramifications are not something they can consent to. It's like giving kids alcohol after "explaining the risks," except alcohol is safer than multiple concussions. Even if you explain to a teen that they can develop lifelong alcohol addiction and damage their liver, they still do not have the ability to make an informed decision. "My parents told me about the risks and gave me permission to binge drink if I want to" is not a policy I'd trust.
I do not understand why we continue to allow full contact football when it so it's so dangerous to the players, especially children.