• macerated_baby_presidents [he/him]
    ·
    16 days ago

    I think it has to do with traditional (religious? catholics) categorization of flesh into meat, poultry, and fish. they think "animals" means "meat"

    • Eris235 [undecided]
      ·
      16 days ago

      A lot of languages also don't consider 'meat' to include 'fish meat', having entirely separate words for the two.

      but yeah, I think in the US, its mostly catholicism brainworms

      • macerated_baby_presidents [he/him]
        ·
        15 days ago

        when they think "animals", they think of the culinary category of meat. Not animal as in "animal, mineral, or vegetable". It's an overloaded word.