• Riley@lemmy.ml
    ·
    2 months ago

    It was the early days of a new technology and way of listening that was completely different compared to the past 60+ years of recorded audio. I guess as a more modern analogy it's like those cheap 3D films at the height of the fad that felt the need to gratuitously shove objects directly in front of the camera to get the most out of the 3D effect.

    • Appoxo@lemmy.dbzer0.com
      ·
      2 months ago

      Those were the better 3d movies because they at least felt like there was depth. Unlike those modern movies.

  • the_post_of_tom_joad [any, any]
    ·
    2 months ago

    One of the worst abuses of stereo in my opinion are old Beatles albums. Maybe cuz the tech was somewhat new they were playing far too much? Too much for me anyway

  • banazir@lemmy.ml
    ·
    2 months ago

    I'd be perfectly fine if everything was just mixed mono. I see little value in stereo. I'm weird like that.

  • bloodfart@lemmy.ml
    ·
    2 months ago

    The early days of stereo (which is what you’re talking about, the recordings of 70s which aren’t using stereo as an “effect” almost universally have the vocals panned to the center. The old way to take the vocals out of a recording was to adjust how much of the signal present equally on both channels was allowed to be played) were all about two things: backwards compatibility with mono systems and giving people with stereo systems a recognizable effect no matter what goofy system they had.

    Wild panning accomplishes both goals.

    Studio engineering that used the stereo format to create the illusion of a room or capture the sound of the room the players were playing in wasn’t developed yet and came from the experimental stereo recordings that sound crazy now like silver apples of the moon.