• Bitrot@lemmy.sdf.org
        ·
        edit-2
        12 hours ago

        If they had said “locally hosted in our datacenter” would you be confused why they didn’t move a rack into your house?

        My question is why are you projecting your limited interpretation as a global truth?

        • Mr. Satan@monyet.cc
          ·
          11 hours ago

          In IT context local is a well establised term. It's either hosted locally, i. e. on machine running the browser or not. A datacenter or cloud are remote machines also by the same well established definition.

        • GenderNeutralBro@lemmy.sdf.org
          ·
          12 hours ago

          If they had said “locally hosted in our datacenter”

          Then that would also be an oxymoron.

          Local is the opposite of remote. This is a remote server. Remote servers are not local. This is not a matter of interpretation.

          • Bitrot@lemmy.sdf.org
            ·
            edit-2
            12 hours ago

            It is, actually. It is local to them, it is remote to you. They are differentiating from a remote server in someone else’s datacenter. It is not that confusing.

            • GenderNeutralBro@lemmy.sdf.org
              ·
              edit-2
              12 hours ago

              This is a FAQ for end users, about a feature in software running on end users' computers.

              It is absolutely doublespeak to call it "local". Are we supposed to invent an entirely new term now to distinguish between remote and local? Please do not accept this usage. It will make meaningful communication much harder.

              Edit: I mean seriously, by this token OpenAI, Google, Facebook, etc. could call their servers "locally hosted". It is an utterly meaningless term if you accept this usage.