I didn't go to the effort of re-ordering these posts, so you're reading from the bottom up; and no, I'm not blurring out the settler's name either. I swear, it's like they factory-build these wind-up toy motherfuckers, they all say the same exact shit in the same exact order like we ain't figured the motherfuckers out already.

EDIT: Now it's kinda sad. Go run to the nazis because you got aired out for being settler trash.

  • loathsome dongeater@lemmygrad.ml
    ·
    19 hours ago

    About Tibet. CIA was also knee deep in Tibet and the religious leadership waa cozy for them. If China did the liberal wet dream of "live and let live" with Tibet it would have inevitably become a vector of destabilisation attempts from US. Not that a conscience-less settler would care about that.

    • frauddogg [they/them, null/void]
      ·
      12 hours ago

      If China did the liberal wet dream of "live and let live" with Tibet it would have inevitably become a vector of destabilisation attempts from US.

      Based on what we've seen regarding how Amerika likes using nearby ideologically-incompatible neighbors over the last like 50 years, this is 100% correct. Hell, I'm about convinced the only reason Amerika had so much interest in propping up the Lamas was because they were slavemasters just like the crackers are.