From what I've observed over the past years, the major difference between Hexbear and Stupidpol is their stance on social issues -- LGBT, Women's Rights, "wokeness" in general, and that usually invites right-wingers to Stupidpol.
But when it comes to geopolitical topics like Ukraine or Israel, or even views regarding the presidential election, China, the Global South in general, etc., their takes are pretty much identical to the ones I see here.
I almost feel like you can approximately divide political stances up into 3 dimensions -- the Ukraine axis, the Israel axis, and the "Wokeness" axis.
From what I've observed over the past years, the major difference between Hexbear and Stupidpol is their stance on social issues -- LGBT, Women's Rights, "wokeness" in general, and that usually invites right-wingers to Stupidpol.
But when it comes to geopolitical topics like Ukraine or Israel, or even views regarding the presidential election, China, the Global South in general, etc., their takes are pretty much identical to the ones I see here.
I almost feel like you can approximately divide political stances up into 3 dimensions -- the Ukraine axis, the Israel axis, and the "Wokeness" axis.
I've observed all combinations except "anti-Ukraine, pro-Israel and pro-LGBT".
That would be the weirdest political take in existence.
using that Chinese social media derived axis it would basically be Social Darwinism with LGBT characteristics
still weird as shit can't think who that would be
Brainrotted trans /pol/ and /lgbt/ user?
Probably exists among some of the very few LGBT Trump supporters.