LibsEatPoop [any] to chat • 1 month agoSo, uh, are we gonna have a nuclear war?message-squaremessage-square99 fedilinkarrow-up193file-text
arrow-up193message-squareSo, uh, are we gonna have a nuclear war?LibsEatPoop [any] to chat • 1 month agomessage-square99 Commentsfedilinkfile-text
minus-squareFrank [he/him, he/him]hexbear15·1 month agohttps://thebulletin.org/doomsday-clock/ The Bulletin of Atomic Scientists has us at 90 seconds to midnight. Not ideal. link
minus-squareHexReplyBot [none/use name]Bhexbear2·1 month agoI found a YouTube link in your comment. Here are links to the same video on alternative frontends that protect your privacy: yewtu.be inv.nadeko.net yt.artemislena.eu piped.video link
minus-squareFortifiedAttack [any]hexbear13·1 month agoThis clock is meaningless drivel. We're really at 2 seconds before midnight if this was updated regularly and accurately. link
minus-squareHexboare [they/them]hexbear8·1 month agoImagine thinking the collapse of a nuclear armed superpower is the safest we've ever been Show It's hard to envision what's closer than long range conventional mission strikes on one nuclear armed state by another nuclear armed state Tactical nukes? link
https://thebulletin.org/doomsday-clock/
The Bulletin of Atomic Scientists has us at 90 seconds to midnight. Not ideal.
The original NYTimes needle
Obligatory Iron Maiden
I found a YouTube link in your comment. Here are links to the same video on alternative frontends that protect your privacy:
This clock is meaningless drivel.
We're really at 2 seconds before midnight if this was updated regularly and accurately.
Imagine thinking the collapse of a nuclear armed superpower is the safest we've ever been
It's hard to envision what's closer than long range conventional mission strikes on one nuclear armed state by another nuclear armed state
Tactical nukes?