i'm always interested to see how an artist extrapolates the elements of pre-plate armor cultures into a theoretical plate design, but if this ai shit ass shit was supposed to look 'roman' there aint shit here. slap some pteruges on it at least
Current models can do armor that while not historically accurate could at least be taken for a Roman by layman. This here is not only made by someone really lazy with his prompts but those prompts most likely didn't even included the word "Roman".
I'm just wondering, how it is that AI is able to do elon musk but was never able to do Lenin and recently even Stalin (it used to be but not anymore), if it's trained on pictures in the net, there is shitton of it and Lenin nowhere look even remotely similar to what AI is cooking, and furthermore the AI is pretty consistent with the bulldog face, where do this came from?
The AI trains itself on more commonly used prompts I believe. So a figure like Musk, who probably has a network of PCs devoted to making AI art of himself 24/7, gets more accurate results than someone like Lenin, who there aren't a lot of photos of, relatively at least. I think AI art also struggles to tell the difference between a picture and a photo, so there is a lot of actual art of Lenin, which the AI tries to use as well as photos.
I'm just spitballing here though, I don't really know.
Maybe but again, ever since the first models become publicly available Lenin always look like this:
Show
Show
Which don't look like basically any popular art of Lenin i ever seen before, 90% of Lenin on internet is the same few of most popular photos so logically speaking AI Lenin should look like on them.
Also Stalin. Last year or so AI could do passable Stalin, for example:
Show
But currently i usually get someone looking more like Ludendorf. And the situation with Stalin is similar like Lenin, 90% of him is also the few popular photos.
i'm always interested to see how an artist extrapolates the elements of pre-plate armor cultures into a theoretical plate design, but if this ai shit ass shit was supposed to look 'roman' there aint shit here. slap some pteruges on it at least
Current models can do armor that while not historically accurate could at least be taken for a Roman by layman. This here is not only made by someone really lazy with his prompts but those prompts most likely didn't even included the word "Roman".
"Handsome tall muscular Elon Musk in buff cool fallout gladiator armour"
I'm just wondering, how it is that AI is able to do elon musk but was never able to do Lenin and recently even Stalin (it used to be but not anymore), if it's trained on pictures in the net, there is shitton of it and Lenin nowhere look even remotely similar to what AI is cooking, and furthermore the AI is pretty consistent with the bulldog face, where do this came from?
The AI trains itself on more commonly used prompts I believe. So a figure like Musk, who probably has a network of PCs devoted to making AI art of himself 24/7, gets more accurate results than someone like Lenin, who there aren't a lot of photos of, relatively at least. I think AI art also struggles to tell the difference between a picture and a photo, so there is a lot of actual art of Lenin, which the AI tries to use as well as photos.
I'm just spitballing here though, I don't really know.
Maybe but again, ever since the first models become publicly available Lenin always look like this:
Which don't look like basically any popular art of Lenin i ever seen before, 90% of Lenin on internet is the same few of most popular photos so logically speaking AI Lenin should look like on them.
Also Stalin. Last year or so AI could do passable Stalin, for example:
But currently i usually get someone looking more like Ludendorf. And the situation with Stalin is similar like Lenin, 90% of him is also the few popular photos.