I'm just pointing out the discrepancy of "critically supporting" countries like Russia and Iran, and even current Afghanistan, but then thinking Rojava is the linchpin of the US imperialist plan for world domination... rather than seeing Rojava's actions from their perspective and considering the context in which those decisions were made.

You are aware t ISIS was planning to genocide/ethnically cleanse the Kurds in northern Syria, right? These people were fighting for literal survival and the US was the only country that was willing and able to help them substantially.

But according to you, they should have allowed fundamentalists to chop off their heads.

That's not an exaggeration. Since the renewed SNA offensive in the north, hundreds of thousands of people have been displaced, fleeing to Rojava, for protection. Apparently Manbij has fallen, Erdogan has been talking for years about taking it.

Rojava is literally under attack by a militia directly supported, armed and trained by a NATO country. Apparently the US had a base in Manbij, but of course they weren't going to clash with Turkey. SDF wants US in Rojava because that's part of the reason preventing Turkey from indiscriminately bombing certain cities (like Manbij).

I think it is wrong to assume Rojava Kurds, Arabs, et al. are dumb idiots who are ready to do US's bidding for a couple of AKs. I think they are people with agency, I think they have their own goals for the future that diverge from the US', even though they may share some immediate goals. They may also see US as a valuable friend to have when trying to get Turkey to stop killing their people.

SDF/Rojava is now under attack from the east by SNA (Turkey) and from the north by Turkey proper. They are still fighting for their existence, they can hardly be called an "imperialist force" or some kind of key player in US' plans for controlling the Middle East.