Yeah, it depends on the criteria. The Nazis were only around for a few years, whereas the British did their thing for centuries. The Nazis were a rookie prodigy who retired after a single red-hot season, the British were a multi-season MVP with way more points on the board.
I think the other part is as Colonials, the British ultimately have given their colonies back, and most.of the colonies are in a reletively decent condition, especially when you conpare it to french colonies for example, like Haiti, which went into perpetual debt, and many west African nations which are relevant today due to the uprising.
Yeah, it depends on the criteria. The Nazis were only around for a few years, whereas the British did their thing for centuries. The Nazis were a rookie prodigy who retired after a single red-hot season, the British were a multi-season MVP with way more points on the board.
I think the other part is as Colonials, the British ultimately have given their colonies back, and most.of the colonies are in a reletively decent condition, especially when you conpare it to french colonies for example, like Haiti, which went into perpetual debt, and many west African nations which are relevant today due to the uprising.