• Gerudo@lemm.ee
    ·
    4 days ago

    Is he OK?

    I know he isn't, but this feels like a ketamine fueled tweetfest.

  • SubArcticTundra@lemmy.ml
    ·
    4 days ago

    Now picture this happening in the 90s/00s: Musk sets up his own british TV channel and starts airing programmes of himself commenting on UK politics from Sillicon Valley. Wouldn't this in itself seem absurd? Wouldn't it spark a political debate on whether the channel should be allowed/regulated?

  • M68040 [they/them]
    ·
    edit-2
    4 days ago

    The fact that he has even a crumb of clout is quite possibly the single most damning indictment of the concept of meritocracy.

    • SoyViking [he/him]
      ·
      4 days ago

      Musk may be more meritocratic than one would imagine. The term meritocracy was coined as a parody of the British class-based education system where children of the rich and powerful always just happens to have the most merit.

      • M68040 [they/them]
        ·
        3 days ago

        Ah, so this is one of those “ironic saying got inverted into being unironic” scenarios like with the Bootstraps or Bad Apples sayings.

    • barrbaric [he/him]
      ·
      4 days ago

      There's no way they'd ever pin a billionaire with something, they're above the law by design.

    • SoyViking [he/him]
      ·
      4 days ago

      Any serious government would have slipped some polonium into his tea a long time ago.

  • St3alth@lemmy.ml
    ·
    4 days ago

    Bruh he needs to fuck off he isn’t a politician neither does he have anything to do with British politics, he can have an opinion of course but when he is donating a shit ton of money to reform party and then trying to persuade the king to overthrow the government and call for a new election that’s a different story it’s obvious what he’s trying to do here.

      • St3alth@lemmy.ml
        ·
        4 days ago

        Exactly he’s not even hiding his intentions. And if he is he’s doing a shit job at it

  • sping@lemmy.sdf.org
    ·
    edit-2
    4 days ago

    I mean this is ludicrous, but he's not suggesting overthrowing the government. He's suggesting Charles does what he has the power to do which is dissolve Parliament, forcing an election. To do so would cause a constitutional crisis in the UK and likely the revocation of that power. But it's clearly nothing more than stupid provocative hyperbole. Musk is a fucking clown but this is some pretty intense spin.

    • HumanPenguin@feddit.uk
      ·
      edit-2
      4 days ago

      What he has the power to do.

      Technically he only has the power to authorise. The PM has the power to request.

      When the reformation happened. After beheading the last ruling king. It became a little more complex then the king passing soverignty to parliment. As the king did not have soverinty after the war the short lived republic did.

      Post reformation when parliment is disbanded. The king is authorising the government (IE pm) to gain sovereignty from parliment. But parliment must actually pass it. Hence the closing ceromony.

      So power never actually resides in the king under the post reformation constitution. But is passed between parliment and the PM. Hence why the Government \PM is in power during an election cycle.

      The only way the King could force parliment to disband. Would be to try and retake power using the loyalty of paliment or the military (who rechnically still swear to obay him).

      But technically he dose not have the power to force it legally.

      Sorry lots of typis. Visually impaired typing on a phone. Is A PIK (Pain In rhe King.)

  • theturtlemoves [he/him]
    ·
    3 days ago

    Noob. Charles's don't have a great track record against Parliament. You need Guy Fawkes for this matchup.