• Yllych [any]
    hexbear
    69
    10 months ago

    Maybe the radioactivity of the water is overblown, but this feels like "I will publicly smoke one cigarette to prove lung cancer is overblown"

    • hexaflexagonbear [he/him]
      hexagon
      hexbear
      53
      10 months ago

      Its probably overblown, but it's crazy to pretend this isn't a case of leaders going "we can handle an extra x cases of cancer per million in order to save $100"

      • Yllych [any]
        hexbear
        25
        10 months ago

        Yes, I saw some people on here saying that the half life of tritium is such that if it were contained for 50 years then the radioactivity would be much less.

        not necessarily an easy task, but I refuse to believe humanity is incapable of doing it. If the Japanese government made serious moves towards that kind of solution I think you'd see a lot less animosity coming from their neighbouring countries.

        • RION [she/her]
          hexbear
          20
          10 months ago

          https://hexbear.net/comment/3812997 apparently they forgot to take something into account and there's actually little to no difference

          • Yllych [any]
            hexbear
            9
            10 months ago

            Ok I was wrong, the water thing is definitely way overblown

  • MorelaakIsBack [comrade/them]
    hexbear
    42
    10 months ago

    in hell, there is a room. it is reserved for barack, and now rahm. they will be served flint tap water and fukushima sashimi for every meal, with predictable results

    • @salton@reddthat.com
      hexbear
      4
      10 months ago

      I'd have different feelings if they decided to eat exclusively contaminated fish and flint tap water for a decade or two.

    • barrbaric [he/him]
      hexbear
      24
      10 months ago

      My reaction too. These monsters can never just do the right thing and [redact] themselves.

  • @impiri@lemm.ee
    hexbear
    35
    10 months ago

    This makes sense. Any Fallout player knows that ghouls are healed by radiation

  • Rojo27 [he/him]
    hexbear
    29
    10 months ago

    So do we get to see the fisherman catch the fish take it to the restaurant, see the chef prepare it and the waiter take it to him?

  • Judge_Juche [she/her]
    hexbear
    26
    10 months ago

    People's reaction to dumping the water is way overblown, like Japan acutally did a pretty good job treating the water and all that is left in it is Tritium, which US and Canadian plants will routinely dump into rivers.

    Personally I think some of the reaction in Asia is becuase there hasen't been a reason for everyone to get mad at Japan in a while. Like no high profile denials of WWII crimes or the PM talking about resurrecting the Imperial Navy and reforming the Co-prosperity Sphere. But dumping the water has gotten people across Asia out into the streets denouncing Japan again, and you love to see people enjoying themselves.

    • SootyChimney [any]
      hexbear
      4
      edit-2
      10 months ago

      I don't think "US and Canada do it" is a very effective argument for something being safe or reasonable. The reality is - We don't know what the effects are, and we can't even be completely sure they're doing what they say they are in the first place. The radioactivity may be low, but the presence of manmade tritium may well cause issues we don't even realise, and as always we're playing a gamble that "this number low so it's probably safe maybe". And that is undeniably a gamble, even if a low-risk one.

  • Budwig_v_1337hoven [he/him]
    hexbear
    22
    10 months ago

    tbf, eating it now is safer than it will be for a while

    like, give those little bone melters a few years to move through the food-chain before you proudly eat the spicy tuna

  • SootyChimney [any]
    hexbear
    18
    edit-2
    10 months ago

    This is so upsettingly uncannily a Simpsons bit - Rich guy eats fish contaminated by radioactive nuclear plant waste water discharged into natural sources to prove it's safe?

    Show

  • Rod_Blagojevic [none/use name]
    hexbear
    15
    10 months ago

    I'm pretty sure the release actually is safe, but it might not be, so I encourage Rahm to go through with this.

    • culpritus [any]
      hexbear
      10
      10 months ago

      It's probably safer to do it sooner than later since bio-accumulation/amplification will likely take a few years to reach serious levels.

  • iridaniotter [she/her, they/them]
    hexbear
    14
    10 months ago

    The anti-environmental protestors keep saying that if the waste is safe, why don't people eat it. And now that people are eating it, it's just a devil's milkshake. Should I pull out the Parenti quote?