Current users have 45 days to find an alternative.

  • ExtremeDullard@lemmy.sdf.org
    ·
    edit-2
    24 hours ago

    American for-profits are so hysterical about not servicing poorer people at cost that they'd rather cut services to everybody rather than be forced to do it.

  • BrikoX@lemmy.zip
    hexagon
    M
    ·
    24 hours ago

    That's what you get when you allow corporations to rob you blind for decades.

  • tacosanonymous@lemm.ee
    ·
    19 hours ago

    They’re probably being paid to not service rural areas. Can’t have them getting informed and making better choices.

  • sovietknuckles [they/them]
    ·
    edit-2
    24 hours ago

    “While we are committed to providing reliable and affordable internet service to customers across the country, New York’s broadband law imposes harmful rate regulations that make it uneconomical for AT&T to invest in and expand our broadband infrastructure in the state,” the company said in statements provided to CNET and Ars Technica.

    This is blogspam. While Ars Technica put this quote near the beginning of their article and wrote an article afterwards to put it into context, this short article gave AT&T the very last word.

  • shortwavesurfer@lemmy.zip
    ·
    17 hours ago

    They don't have fiber in the state at all and a guaranteed 200 MBPS is quite difficult to do over fixed wireless.