Seriously.
  • SaltyIceteaMaker@lemmy.ml
    ·
    1 year ago

    I did infact read the article and the irrelevant opinion i'm referring to are things likethe fact that the ceo donated against same sex marriage wich while i don't agree with that has nothing to do with the browser at hand.

    Also saying it's not reasonable to hold such an opinion is just another opinion to debate over, just not in this threat.

    The thing with the up/downvotes: i say i stand corrected. I didn't look at your ratio. I apologize.

    Assuming i am watching fox news is:

    1. Wrong. (I don't even live in the us) &
    2. Unprofessional as it seems to be used as an insult in this case. (Excuse me if i am mistake)

    Also It seems like you are trying to passively (or actively with that one) insult me on multiple occasions in this discussion.

    I refuse to partake in a discussion where the other person tries to reinforce their point with insult's.

    Please only reply if you can stay "formal" (or as formal as one is to strangers on the internet)

    • rjs001@lemmygrad.ml
      ·
      1 year ago

      -Defends homophobes -Tries to ensure formality when that angers people.

      Donations are relevant as that’s where the money may go that you give him by using the browser.

      Living in the US or not, not sure how that’s relevant. It’s accessible in other countries so where you live isn’t relevant.

      You act as though where your money goes is irrelevant to using a product and then scoff when others (rightfully) point out that that’s ridiculous.