It doesn’t work as it isn’t materialist. Any supposed benifit would just be a placebo
Muerte a EE.UU., Ucrania, la OTAN y la UE
It doesn’t work as it isn’t materialist. Any supposed benifit would just be a placebo
SecondThought is a patsocs since he is in the patsoc CPUSA. A group that uses terminology like “Bill of Rights” and doesn’t promote land back ideology. Those two things (especially lacking land back as a fundamental tenet of socialist movements in the US) come off to me as egregious symbols of patsocism. I don’t see any way that someone could be in a group that calls themsleves socialist while using American terms like that and ignoring land back in the US could only be that. I don’t think Yugopnik is patsoc even though I dislike him still
How said explain that to them? I said don’t promote snake oils which is what Hakim is saying. He should have left his idealist mouth shut about it
Not offer religious snake oils
Improve their material conditions and not sell them an idealist snake oil
Because he claims to be Marxist which is lying. Marxism is based on materialism and Islam is based i. idealism
The very reason that you can print infinite money and not harm the quality of life of the people via inflation is through economic hegemony
I just don’t know why they are like this. I’ve seen people say this in real life. They have universally been western European
Says something non Marxist that is tailist about an idealist ideology while ignoring Marxist analysis tends to not be popular
He might know more about Islam but still lacks Marxist analysis of the situation
I think he’s Italian so perhaps there is more about him in Italian?
Day is correct here. Hakim is being non materialist
Why do people always say they aren’t from the US? It seems like a huge amount of Europeans just think the CIA has no effect in Europe and that they are immune to propaganda just because they aren’t from the US. I constantly hear them being that up
Because the existence of MMT in the US would rely upon US economic hegemony to keep the dollar having any value in a situation like that
I misread what they wrote. In a platonic way it fine but under no circumstances should an org be someone’s personal dating site
Yugopnik was joking even though he quotes him very frequently and does so often? Hakim was ignoring the material reality of the way that Islam is viewed. Islam, on its own doesn’t matter in regards to this, it’s relevant only in the ways that it’s adherents alter their behavior due to it. He is acting like it was Islam on its own which is perposturous. Islam is idealist and resistance movements have existed in countries without it
MMT doesn’t work in smaller countries. It isn’t really a policy that doesn’t rely on economic hegemony
Hakim, the guy who makes a podcast with a patsoc and a Zizek supporter is a real socialist who shouldn’t be critiqued?
That wasn’t the question. The issue is that Hakim is performing reactionary tailism
Organizing? It’s no more organizing than laying in bed it. It fact, it’s less because laying in bed isn’t promoting reactionary thought