At least until the 2024 election cycle starts even earlier than this one.

  • RalphGrenader [comrade/them]
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    4 years ago

    Seeing as many of their ancestors were socialist, I don't think it's outside the realm of possibility. I guess you're extent of history ends at 1950? Low education individuals with nothing but Fox news to hear their destitution. If you can't win over those individuals with populist ideologies you should give up now.

    • jack [he/him, comrade/them]
      ·
      edit-2
      4 years ago

      What are you even talking about? The libs had plenty of socialist ancestors too, but politics doesn't run in the blood.

      Edit: I'm really struggling to figure this out. What did you mean by "chuds"? Suddenly it seems like you're talking about... poor rural white people? I don't know. If so, where did that come from? Do you think that group is synonymous with chuds? Most right wing maniacs in America don't fit into that social class, they're petty bourgeois or straight up bourgeois. Those people are so reactionary because of their class interest, and they're the last ones we should waste our political energy on when they constantly fantasize about murdering us. Like, honestly, what do you mean?

      • infuziSporg [e/em/eir]
        ·
        4 years ago

        but politics doesn’t run in the blood.

        P [olitics] is stored in the balls.

      • RalphGrenader [comrade/them]
        ·
        4 years ago

        We may be talking about differing groups tbh. I think you mean Beautiful Boater chuds, I mean low educated, rural chuds. Not the all chuds are created equal, but the boater contingent I'll agree wouldn't be reeducated very well. Imo neither would PMC libs.

        Low educated white rural voters overwhelming have gone Trump.