• hrosts@lemm.ee
    ·
    edit-2
    1 year ago

    I've actually been extremely consistent with my usage of the term throughout this conversation. The people I'm talking to keep using it for everyone under the sun, that's true. From a member of a third-world communist party 50 years ago to themselves to Joseph Stalin. My focus is currently on the online English-speaking community/ies of the last 5-10 years who would fit the term

    • Gelamzer
      ·
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      deleted by creator

      • hrosts@lemm.ee
        ·
        edit-2
        1 year ago

        english speaking online world

        Who else would we talk about in a Lemmy conversation about people on Lemmy supporting Russia? I've been telling you the Vietnamese don't matter in this context from the very beginning.

        • Gelamzer
          ·
          edit-2
          1 year ago

          deleted by creator

          • hrosts@lemm.ee
            ·
            1 year ago

            You know if you've misunderstood my initial comment you can just drop the posturing and say so

            • Gelamzer
              ·
              edit-2
              1 year ago

              deleted by creator

              • hrosts@lemm.ee
                ·
                edit-2
                1 year ago

                It all comes down to ego

                EDIT: I've made myself clear what I was talking about. The context was there, you were the first one to bring up the 20th century people. I could take some responsibility as the term is vague, but too many of you went for the dunks and posturing, making up shit about what I meant on the fly. The problem that truth here is relative and if enough of you decide that is what happened, whatever context I had in mind wouldn't matter. It's easy to be cynical about the whole interaction for both of us. Also good for the ego, as being wrong hurts and we all know it. I'm off to bed, will see if you add something else here later. It wasn't nice to talk to you, bye.