EDIT: no, I don't sympathize with nazis (neither I sympathize with those who call everyone nazi when they're losing an argument ;)

  • ScrivenerX@lemm.ee
    ·
    1 year ago

    It's worse than just that. They argue that acknowledgement of Stalin's atrocities is Holocaust denial.

    They are so scared and insecure they will lash out against anything that slightly challenges their beliefs. If they post sources it will be misreadings of fringe groups, or conveniently ignoring facts. Like how they believe tiananmen square wasn't a big deal because the China killed about 300 people a mile away. Or how Cuba is a utopia even though it's citizens chose to get run over by the coast guard instead of living there.

    • ThereRisesARedStar [she/her, they/them]
      ·
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      They argue that acknowledgement of Stalin's atrocities is Holocaust denial.

      No, we argue that equating the bad things the soviet union did to the holocaust is holocaust trivialization, which is a take from mainstream liberal historians. Because the bad things the soviet union did were tiny compared to the holocaust and pretty tame compared to the other Allies.

    • brain_in_a_box [he/him]
      ·
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      As ever, actual Jewish Holocaust scholars agree with us

      https://jewishcurrents.org/the-double-genocide-theory

    • uralsolo
      ·
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      deleted by creator