EDIT: no, I don't sympathize with nazis (neither I sympathize with those who call everyone nazi when they're losing an argument ;)

  • MF_COOM [he/him]
    hexbear
    66
    10 months ago

    geordi-no defederate to maintain your very special echo chamber

    geordi-yes defederate to stop sh.tjust.works chuds from harassing your comrades in DMs with violent, transphobic and ableist attacks

  • ZoomeristLeninist [comrade/them, she/her]
    hexbear
    60
    edit-2
    10 months ago

    lol its this shit every time libs see a legitimate left stance. im assuming you’ve seen the sh.itjust.works defed post. its like 5 super vocal users having a conniption fit that there are communists on the internet

    • Tankiedesantski [he/him]
      hexbear
      36
      10 months ago

      Hah. As if anyone could be more angry at communists on the internet than other communists on the internet.

  • Lvxferre@lemmy.ml
    hexbear
    40
    10 months ago

    This post assumes that a meaningful amount of defed instances are caused by simple lack of agreement. Often, it's an orthogonal matter - it boils down to instance A actually understanding something about the userbase of instance B and saying "I'm not dealing with this shit, it'll make the instance worse for its own users". For example: the typical user of B might be disingenuous, or preach immoral prescriptions, behave like a chimp, or be a bloody stupid piece of trash that should've stayed in Reddit to avoid smearing its stupidity everywhere here.

    Are instance admins too eager to pull the trigger for defed? Perhaps, in some cases; specially because it handles groups of users instead of individuals. But those cases are better addressed through actual examples, not through a meme talking on generic grounds.

    • Catradora_Stalinism [she/her, comrade/them]
      hexbear
      16
      10 months ago

      For example: the typical user of B might be disingenuous, or preach immoral prescriptions, behave like a chimp, or be a bloody stupid piece of trash that should've stayed in Reddit to avoid smearing its stupidity everywhere here.

      lemm.ee, SJW, programming dev,

      really anyone who isn't lemmygrad, Hexbear, or some of lemmy

    • body_by_make@lemmy.dbzer0.com
      hexbear
      15
      10 months ago

      You can’t enter a discussion with somebody who’s just trying to bombard you into submission. OP is wildly ignorant or just somebody sad they’re being defederated on a different account.

  • Infamousblt [any]
    hexbear
    26
    10 months ago

    The marketplace of ideas is only okay if they're ideas I agree with!

    • Flinch [he/him]
      hexbear
      37
      10 months ago

      people hate getting called out for their terrible opinions shrug-outta-hecks

        • Zuberi 👀@lemmy.dbzer0.com
          hexbear
          19
          10 months ago

          Any instance not arguing in good faith gets removed normally.

          Why so much drama over fed or defed, just change instances if you don't agree with your admin

          • @flashgnash@lemm.ee
            hexbear
            2
            edit-2
            10 months ago

            I think where that falls down is if a big community is in X instance, the instance admins have control over that instance

            Doesn't matter what instance you switch to if the communities you participate in are under that instance's control

            Not saying that's a huge problem yet but it could turn into one and then we get powermods all over again

    • Schadrach@lemmy.sdf.org
      hexbear
      9
      10 months ago

      Currently. Of course in the past it was exploding heads for being Nazis, Lemmygrad for being insufferable tankies, then Burggit for lolicon, now hexbear for being insufferable tankies.

    • @BigNote@lemm.ee
      hexbear
      9
      10 months ago

      When everyone you meet is an asshole, you are probably the real asshole.

      Funny how this works with social media as well.

  • ThisMachineKillsFascists [they/them]
    hexbear
    24
    10 months ago

    neither I sympathize with those who call everyone nazi when they're losing an argument ;)

    Oh hey, look, it's the same thought terminating argument that the alt-right uses to whitewash Nazis!

    • @letsgocrazy@lemm.ee
      hexbear
      1
      10 months ago

      Hey look its the same thought terminating argument tankies use when they want to bring about purges for "wrong think".

      • ShimmeringKoi [comrade/them]
        hexbear
        9
        edit-2
        10 months ago

        It's so cute when one of you is obviously just pulling out whatever scary Orwell words you remember from 8th grade english class

  • @Mouette@jlai.lu
    hexbear
    23
    10 months ago

    If the 'thing you dont agree' with is hate speech or shit promotting violence for example that's the only sane option you have lol

      • @mustardman@discuss.tchncs.de
        hexbear
        21
        10 months ago

        Here's a comment thread where a Hexbear user said "I hope to kill people like you" because I simply said I supported democratic socialism.

        Going on any Hexbear instance people froth over telling anyone right of Karl Marx to "get up against the wall". You guys are, and will always be, a joke.

        • AlpineSteakHouse [any]
          hexbear
          37
          10 months ago

          You said you supported Social Democracy not Democratic Socialism. Dem Socs are well-meaning but idealistic, not optimistic but the political philosophy of idealism. Soc Dems are supporters of a kinder capitalism for the Imperial core but keeping the child slaves mining cobalt in the Congo.

          The fact that you think these are the same proves the original posters point that you should read theory. They were harsh but you were implying that keeping exploitation of the third world is preferable to socialism.

          Dude you still don’t stop worker exploitation, don’t solve the contradiction of working and capitalist classes, don’t end imperialism or colonialism (social democracy outsources exploitation to the third world)

          Ok let me know how your method works out

          • @mustardman@discuss.tchncs.de
            hexbear
            8
            10 months ago

            You said you supported Social Democracy not Democratic Socialism.

            What a terrible mistake to make! Perhaps you should have assumed it was the correct orientation of the two words that are spelled exactly the same.

            The fact that you think these are the same proves the original posters point that you should read theory.

            I have, but thanks for the suggestion.

            • CarbonScored [any]
              hexbear
              17
              edit-2
              10 months ago

              Assuming people are using words in the way they are widely and commonly accepted to mean (I mean, just look at Wikipedia for an easy starting point) is not a bad thing?

                • Alaskaball [comrade/them]
                  hexbear
                  15
                  10 months ago

                  I'm innudated with endless notifications from you dweebs, mistakes happen.

                  People keep telling me that I shit my pants based off the way I smell and the growing brown stain on my pants but they're all tankies because they're all wrong

            • @uralsolo
              hexbear
              15
              edit-2
              8 months ago

              deleted by creator

              • @mustardman@discuss.tchncs.de
                hexbear
                5
                10 months ago

                What incredible insight. The word 'social' is referring to 'socialism' and so is the relation between 'democracy' and 'democratic'.

                It would take an idiot to mix these up, right?

                • AlpineSteakHouse [any]
                  hexbear
                  10
                  10 months ago

                  The word 'social' is referring to 'socialism' and so is the relation between 'democracy' and 'democratic'.

                  I guess social security = socialism security in your world? Social welfare programs are not socialism and if your political education included anything beyond Elizabeth Warren's policy page you'd know that.

            • AlpineSteakHouse [any]
              hexbear
              12
              10 months ago

              What a terrible mistake to make! Perhaps you should have assumed it was the correct orientation of the two words that are spelled exactly the same.

              Your beef is with the English Language not me. How is it my fault that you misidentified yourself? Funnily enough, you still don't identify your actual political position. It's clear that the only political position you'd take is what gives you an advantage in the argument. Fucking debatebros lol.

              I have, but thanks for the suggestion.

              Reading so much theory that you confuse two different political ideologies. Sometimes I read so much theory that that I claim to be a monarchist when I really mean to say I'm an anti-monarchist. Obviously the other person should have understood what I meant. Your literally on a communication medium that allows you to plan and edit your comments. You have no excuse for making this grade school mistake.

              • @mustardman@discuss.tchncs.de
                hexbear
                5
                edit-2
                10 months ago

                Debatebro? That's what Hexbear does best.

                I would actually love to engage in good faith discussions, but Hexbear users only operate in bad faith, particularly by sealioning. Like clockwork, you don't engage in ideas but rather give reading assignments.

                I've read Das Kapital and agree with virtually all the premises about how society is unfair to those who actually generate the surplus value and think that we need to fix a system that breaks cyclically, as Karl Marx correctly predicted in volume I. The only solutions I've seen presented are a total revolution a la 1917, which occured before globalization. Anything close to this in the current globalized world will kill at minimum hundreds of millions globally due to interdependence on products that Marx would consider "needs", such as medications and medical equipment like dialysis machines.

                The difference between you and me is that I'd rather work to reestablish democracy away from capital interests. I don't want a dictatorship, I want a functional democracy. Propaganda is often used to disillusion the working class from democracy, and if you don't vote in elections then you are clearly part of the problem.

                Edit: Lmao. Citing"theory" gets crickets from the people who endlessly say "you just haven't read theory". It's like they don't know what to do with someone who reads to understand, rather than "reading" just to virtue signal.

                • brain_in_a_box [he/him]
                  hexbear
                  8
                  10 months ago

                  Debatebro? That's what Hexbear does best.

                  Hahaha, literally "I know you are but what am I"

                • ShimmeringKoi [comrade/them]
                  hexbear
                  3
                  10 months ago

                  reading" just to virtue signal.

                  Lmao peak angry chud solipsism. "I would never read except to lord it over others, so that must be what these commies are doing."

        • 420blazeit69 [he/him]
          hexbear
          31
          10 months ago

          If course you would, like a good little authoritarian.

          In my ideal society I’d give people like you the freedom you deserve.

          This you?

        • Mindfury [he/him]
          hexbear
          24
          10 months ago

          because I simply said I supported democratic socialism.

          so you promoted violence first?
          i'm failing to see your complaint here

        • @uralsolo
          hexbear
          23
          edit-2
          8 months ago

          deleted by creator

          • @mustardman@discuss.tchncs.de
            hexbear
            8
            10 months ago

            I support what are realistic policies actually will push the status quo in the direction you want.

            Larping on the internet waiting for a revolution to occur seems like a nice fantasy.

            • @uralsolo
              hexbear
              19
              edit-2
              8 months ago

              deleted by creator

              • @mustardman@discuss.tchncs.de
                hexbear
                3
                edit-2
                10 months ago

                There are numerous democratic socialists who are in Congress, you just aren't paying attention.

                Run for office. There have been many spoilers from genuine grassroots campaigns. Don't want to do either? Keep coping and seething online.

                • TankieTanuki [he/him]
                  hexbear
                  17
                  edit-2
                  10 months ago

                  The master's tools will never dismantle the master's house. Entryism always ends up changing the entrant instead of the system. We are revolutionary socialists.

                • Chapo_is_Red [he/him]
                  hexbear
                  14
                  10 months ago

                  I too support democratic socialism

                  chavez-salute

                  maduro-salute

                  evo

                  allende-rhetoric

                  Allende just needed more people's militias

                • @uralsolo
                  hexbear
                  14
                  edit-2
                  8 months ago

                  deleted by creator

          • @letsgocrazy@lemm.ee
            hexbear
            1
            10 months ago

            So socialism, if it has any degree of democracy to it, which is kind of essential to socialism, is evil in your eyes.

            What version of decision making is acceptable in socialism then?

            Just one party rule?

            • @uralsolo
              hexbear
              1
              edit-2
              8 months ago

              deleted by creator

        • @Aria@lemmygrad.ml
          hexbear
          9
          10 months ago

          Extreme violence is still violence. Industrial violence on a massive scale is still violence. You are advocating for violence, terrible violence, and then getting upset someone else advocated for comparatively mild violence.

  • @NotSpez@lemm.ee
    hexbear
    23
    edit-2
    10 months ago

    Defederation is becoming the Lemmy meme.

    I think being on lemmy does not in any way oblige a user to listen to everyone all the time. A lot of people will just come here for a good time. And for the freedom of speech activists: freedom of speech also involves other peoples freedom not to want to listen.

    Moreover, I think most people who want to defederate with certain instances don’t necessarily have a problem with different world views, but have a problem with the tone being set by a small percentage of the users of said instances. Unfortunately, only a small percentage is needed to create a general vibe.

    I hope it will be possible for individual users to block entire instances very soon, this way this whole debate will become obsolete. Personally, I can’t wait for it (the debate to become obsolete, not blocking instances necessarily)

    • @InputZero@lemmy.ml
      hexbear
      8
      10 months ago

      Also freedom of speech is between your government and you. Your government can't censor speech, private companies, individuals, organizations, ect, can censor your speech or censor themselves from hearing it. All rights are only between an individual and their government.

      • brain_in_a_box [he/him]
        hexbear
        30
        10 months ago

        The private property rights that give private companies the ability to censor your speech are created and inforced by the government in the first place, so functionally it's not different. A handful of massive companies who functionally own the government getting to police what is acceptable speech is not functionally different from the government doing it directly.

        • @InputZero@lemmy.ml
          hexbear
          10
          10 months ago

          Oh absolutely, taken in a greater context which I totally neglected to say that's absolutely true.

    • @DogMuffins@discuss.tchncs.de
      hexbear
      0
      10 months ago

      The blocking instances thing won't necessarily solve this problem.

      You might be able to block posts from an instance but not comments or votes.

      • @NotSpez@lemm.ee
        hexbear
        0
        10 months ago

        Blocking votes is not a concern, but it’s the comment toxicity that is (in my opinion) making this place lose something very special.

  • UlyssesT [he/him]
    hexbear
    23
    edit-2
    10 months ago

    Flashing button number 4 "U R MENTALLY ILL" smuglord

  • @dangblingus@lemmy.dbzer0.com
    hexbear
    19
    10 months ago

    Many instances have shit like hexbear federated, but have explicit rules on the side saying "no tankie shit". make it make sense.

        • TheBroodian [none/use name]
          hexbear
          37
          10 months ago

          Heaven forbid an actually existing place on the planet actually make some real tangible gains for its people while necessarily suppressing threats

          • @mounderfod@lemmy.sdf.org
            hexbear
            2
            10 months ago

            There's "threats" and there's "anyone remotely criticising the regime"

            There are some tangible gains in these places but also significant losses for the freedoms and rights of their residents

          • @mounderfod@lemmy.sdf.org
            hexbear
            2
            10 months ago

            Idk where the homophobia is, I'm partial to sucking the odd dick myself, just not Mao Zedong or Vladimir Putin :p

            • ProfessorOwl_PhD [any]
              hexbear
              13
              10 months ago

              "umm actually I used it as an insult because it's a good thing!"

              How do you people survive the cognitive dissonance necessary to convince yourself you're not being bigoted?

              • @mounderfod@lemmy.sdf.org
                hexbear
                1
                10 months ago

                "you people"?

                Besides, I'm not bigoted because I disagree with your ideology, my way of pointing that out may have been hyperbolic but certainly not bigoted

                • ProfessorOwl_PhD [any]
                  hexbear
                  3
                  10 months ago

                  Yeah, you people, people who used homophobic insults about dick sucking but insist it's ok because they're gay/bi/have an LGBT friend.

                  I agree that you're not bigoted because you disagree with our ideology, but you are definitely bigoted for using bigoted insults to point it out.

        • @uralsolo
          hexbear
          28
          edit-2
          8 months ago

          deleted by creator

          • @mounderfod@lemmy.sdf.org
            hexbear
            3
            10 months ago

            I'm not communist, but I do observe that many of the existing "communist" states seem to be just authoritarianism disguised as the common good

            • Zuzak [fae/faer, she/her]
              hexbear
              10
              edit-2
              10 months ago

              I'm celebrating the increase in life expectancy from 35 to higher than that of the US, actually, which is the win I think it is.

              The point is not the immediate increase in that specific 5 year period, the point is the clear trend of rapid, long term increases after a long period of stagnation, with the pivitol turning point being exactly when the CPC came to power. You're supposed to look at the whole graph.

              • @mustardman@discuss.tchncs.de
                hexbear
                1
                10 months ago

                China never manipulates data coming out of their authoritarian country so good thing we can trust it. I'm sure their life expectancy is great with all their industrial pollution that regularly causes smog in their inner cities.

                • Zuzak [fae/faer, she/her]
                  hexbear
                  6
                  edit-2
                  10 months ago

                  Here is my source do you have a source that disputes that? Or is your belief based entirely on unfalsifiable faith?

                  Also curious if you think Chinese life expectancy is still like 35 or what lmao

                  You may also be interested in what the World Bank, that infamous communist propaganda rag, has to say:

                  Over the past 40 years, the number of people in China with incomes below $1.90 per day – the International Poverty Line as defined by the World Bank to track global extreme poverty– has fallen by close to 800 million. With this, China has contributed close to three-quarters of the global reduction in the number of people living in extreme poverty.

            • HumanBehaviorByBjork [any, undecided]
              hexbear
              3
              edit-2
              10 months ago

              My god he can't read a graph. How has our educational system been allowed to fail for this long?

              I'm not committed at all to China as the salvation of the communist project, but it's exactly this sort of self-imposed illiteracy and ignorance, and nearly religious faith in the inferiority and duplicity of The Orient that makes me default to distrusting anything negative a cracker says about it.

              • @mustardman@discuss.tchncs.de
                hexbear
                1
                10 months ago

                Comrade, I also blindly trust any graph as dear leader would have it.

                https://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/thumb/0/00/Trump_holding_altered_Dorian_forecast_map.png/800px-Trump_holding_altered_Dorian_forecast_map.png

                • HumanBehaviorByBjork [any, undecided]
                  hexbear
                  1
                  10 months ago

                  let's skip to the end of the discussion: I say "that's not anything like what I said." you say "yes but you believe those statistics are true???" I say "do you have any good evidence that they're fabricated, and that the life expectancy in China is actually still hovering around 40?" you beg the question, possibly implying that Chinese people are inherently untrustworthy, and accuse me of supporting genocide. There is nothing I can say to you that will instill an ounce of critical thinking ability in you.

                  wall-talk

        • @randint@lemm.ee
          hexbear
          12
          10 months ago

          Careful calling those regimes authoritarian. Hexbears like to attack this point by assigning a slightly different definition to authoritarian and then either (a) claim that all governments are "authoritarian" or (b) blame liberals for using this word to demonize socialist states. I once saw someone cite https://en.prolewiki.org/wiki/Authoritarianism to "prove" that those states are not authoritarian.

          • brain_in_a_box [he/him]
            hexbear
            28
            10 months ago

            Not by "assigning a slightly different definition", just by applying the definition consistently, rather than using the us-foreign-policy standard.

          • @ScrivenerX@lemm.ee
            hexbear
            5
            10 months ago

            It's worse than just that. They argue that acknowledgement of Stalin's atrocities is Holocaust denial.

            They are so scared and insecure they will lash out against anything that slightly challenges their beliefs. If they post sources it will be misreadings of fringe groups, or conveniently ignoring facts. Like how they believe tiananmen square wasn't a big deal because the China killed about 300 people a mile away. Or how Cuba is a utopia even though it's citizens chose to get run over by the coast guard instead of living there.

            • ThereRisesARedStar [she/her, they/them]
              hexbear
              30
              edit-2
              10 months ago

              They argue that acknowledgement of Stalin's atrocities is Holocaust denial.

              No, we argue that equating the bad things the soviet union did to the holocaust is holocaust trivialization, which is a take from mainstream liberal historians. Because the bad things the soviet union did were tiny compared to the holocaust and pretty tame compared to the other Allies.

            • brain_in_a_box [he/him]
              hexbear
              28
              edit-2
              10 months ago

              As ever, actual Jewish Holocaust scholars agree with us

              https://jewishcurrents.org/the-double-genocide-theory

            • @uralsolo
              hexbear
              24
              edit-2
              8 months ago

              deleted by creator

    • HumanBehaviorByBjork [any, undecided]
      hexbear
      4
      10 months ago

      easy solution: your definition of tankie shit is so incredibly broad that it includes anything to the left of the US Democratic party

  • @TheMightyCanuck@sh.itjust.works
    hexbear
    17
    10 months ago

    I think they're mainly quick to defederate because they don't want to burn out their mods.

    Conflict and drama means lots of work for them so I can see it being an easy choice. Personally I'm happy my instance isn't too trigger happy with it