• UlyssesT
    ·
    edit-2
    2 months ago

    deleted by creator

    • I_Has_A_Hat@lemmy.ml
      ·
      1 year ago

      It's a metaphor, my god. You want a less technical version? Neurology is like a farmer analyzing his soil to figure out it's pH and NPK content to determine what crops will go best. Psychology is studying decades worth of Farmers Almanacs. The point is, only one deals with hard, definitive numbers.

      I will grant that my view is a matter of opinion, but it is my firm belief that any science that can not answer it's own questions with solid, irrefutable, numerical answers is an undeveloped science.

      You may take that as an insult, in which case 1. It's not meant as one, and 2. Get over yourself. It's an observation. I'm not saying these fields aren't important and won't eventually develop far enough to have such answers, but as they are, right now, they are filled with deficiencies.

      Because there are no hard, irrefutable, numerical answers, these fields inherently invite biased studies with conclusions searching for evidence rather than the other way around. And while this may not be the norm, it absolutely exists and can be used to justify anything. Then other studies cite that study which cites that study, and on and on. And since it can't just be disproven with an equation, its much harder to refute and correct.

      It's educated guesses. Maybe some day they won't be guesses, just like we don't guess that 1+1=2 or that oxygen and hydrogen can combine to make water; but for right now, they're guesses. And no amount of saying that's offensive to those who study it will change that.

      • UlyssesT
        ·
        edit-2
        2 months ago

        deleted by creator

        • I_Has_A_Hat@lemmy.ml
          ·
          1 year ago

          Nothing good is going to come after an opener like that.

          Yea, and nothing good will come from a shitty meme attacking a choice of metaphor rather than it's content. Which is what you did to start. What a great picture you posted, is that supposed to represent the strawman you built rather than form any actual argument other than "no you're wrong"?

          • UlyssesT
            ·
            edit-2
            2 months ago

            deleted by creator

            • I_Has_A_Hat@lemmy.ml
              ·
              1 year ago

              “Psychology worthless because brain is a computer”

              See this? This right here? This is you attacking the choice of metaphor rather than the content.

              • UlyssesT
                ·
                edit-2
                2 months ago

                deleted by creator

                  • UlyssesT
                    ·
                    edit-2
                    2 months ago

                    deleted by creator

              • Rambi@lemm.ee
                ·
                1 year ago

                The metaphor was the only content you fucking moron, and it wasn't even a good one. And that's not even to mention whatever you were saying about the brain being like soil or whatever lmfao. Just admit the few sentence throwaway comment you made was stupid and move on, Jesus Christ.